Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> 4422. elver-iov++ 13ty� FIELD REP,DESIGN_ of 5 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 064 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 07/28/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 60-70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0945/1015 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, EIT <br /> Attachments: 0 Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: 0-7;,- <br /> ❑ Installation Records ✓❑ Other Reviewed By: RL <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lots 220-223 and Lot 243. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 220: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed the excavation of the footing,crawl space, and crawl space drain for Lot <br /> 220 prior to our arrival on-site. Previously, GeoDesign noted that the Lot 220 area had been over-excavated-3-4 feet <br /> down to firm and unyielding ground(during removal of surcharge material)and brought back to plan grade with material <br /> compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. GeoDesign <br /> noted that the exposed foundation subgrade material consisted of a brown SAND(f-m)with silt which could generally be <br /> probed less than 1 inch using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade <br /> material was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; an in-place density test indicated that the material had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade material observed today is currently suitable for <br /> support of the intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any loose and saturated material be removed from the base <br /> of the footings prior to placement of concrete. <br /> LOT 221: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed the excavation of the footing, crawl space, and crawl space drain for Lot <br /> 221 prior to our arrival on-site. Previously, GeoDesign noted that the Lot 221 area had been over-excavated—3-4 feet <br /> down to firm and unyielding ground (during removal of surcharge material)and brought back to plan grade with material <br /> compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. GeoDesign <br /> noted that the exposed foundation subgrade material consisted of a brown SAND (f-m)with silt which could generally be <br /> probed less than 1 inch using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade <br /> material was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; an in-place density test indicated that the material had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade material observed today is currently suitable for <br /> support of the intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any loose and saturated material be removed from the base <br /> of the footings prior to placement of concrete. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />