Laserfiche WebLink
18 <br /> Memo to Planning Commission,re:REVV18-03(Sonrise Christian) June 8,2018 <br /> The Development Agreement was entered into on the 10th of January,2011, but was never recorded as <br /> required.Subsequent to this Rezone and Development Agreement,the ownership of the various parcels <br /> was no longer under one control.The parcel that was zoned C-1 in 2010 was sold to Sonrise Christian in <br /> 2018,which was unaware that the Development Agreement bound their property to other parcels since <br /> the document was not recorded and did not show up in title search. <br /> In 2012,the parcel that Sonrise Christian bought was rezoned(Ord. No.3270-12)from C-1 to E-1 <br /> • (Evergreen Way),which is the zoning now in effect for the Sonrise Christian parcel. <br /> EXHIBIT 1 AREA 3 <br /> BFT oNE j{ "`: 'g'' 311 <br /> "•"- <br /> E-1(EvergreenWay)Zone-i I•_' . . 'I - �' `I•I J- <br /> O R,,o*Aren3 � _ fr- <br /> Md, *IZ <br /> 1 3,..-.G. . i I :. 1 1 I,�`i' r4' <br /> {`. i' lel I-. ay •'7 9 Il..H ,, <br /> I <br /> • <br /> nm�.'-: ..rte.. . � - ' <br /> :.I:. , ':r. '{F� <br /> < n <br /> ,t,,,.... :,,,.., .„,,,... as,,,,., : , :::).‘,-,-, .: i 1 <br /> , . <br /> Irl_ :: i y , �J <br /> 11.1,--A..--.n.;. hdh •ft.';''' I. ' ce-.i. y.••;-:0: <br /> . Si ' <br /> t <br /> ii�l 1 • 71.4. <br /> Sonrise Christian requests that their property be removed from the Development Agreement.The <br /> owner of the other parcels in the Development Agreement concur with this request and are willing to <br /> sign an amended Development Agreement(see attached). <br /> One of the main reasons that the subject parcel of land was included in the original development <br /> agreement is that the owners at that time intended to develop the property as an integrated <br /> development with other properties that share a common access. Sonrise Christian proposes to use the <br /> site for an expansion of their parking lot,which accesses Airport Road through a different access point. <br /> Based on this change in access,there will be no access to the other lots within the remainder of the <br /> property affected by the Development Agreement. There is no reason for the property to remain a part <br /> of the Development Agreement. <br /> 2 <br /> 31 <br />