Laserfiche WebLink
�. , <br />. , <br />a,:.. . , . . <br />�F <br />CITY OL' ]7\TI:RLT'I' - T30ARIJ Ol•' AllJU5TN[�NT <br />ORll�R <br />1'JI-I1:RT'AS, fl�crel.ofore, therc was filed with Che City of �veretL Planning <br />lleparhnenC ou llecemUcr 27, 1972 an applicalion for a variancc of 5ecLiou No. 130 <br />ot �varcht Cily Code No. 15. 04 Uy Mr. Joe Pignataro, 7300.rvcrgreen Nay for <br />permission lo erecC an advertising sign to a maximum height of 47 feet wliich is <br />greaCcr than Ihe allowable maximmn hcight of 35 feeC, on the following descriUed <br />properly: • . <br />All thal porlion of the Northeast quart:�r oi 5ouCheasL quarter of NorChwest <br />quarter of Section 7, To�vnship 28 Noi•th, Range 5 Last, W.M., descrilzed <br />as follows: <br />CommencinF at tl�e intersection of the East line of StaCe Road No. 1 <br />aud Uie North line of plat of T3everly IIome TracCs, Division No. 7., <br />according lo p1aC tl�ereo[ recordec: in Volwne 10 of Plats, page 25, <br />records of Snohomish CounCy, Wasliingl:on Clie true point of beginning; <br />thence North 88° 50' �ast along said NorNi line of said Plal for <br />462.25 feet to the East line of NorthwesC quarter of said Section 7, <br />Chence North 0° 48' WesC along said East line for 175. O1 feet; tltence <br />south 88° 50' WesC for 428. 15 feet to an intei•sectiontvith the �ast <br />line of State 12oad No. 1; thence Southwesterly along said Easl line <br />of State Road for 178. 2S feet Co true poinC of beginning. <br />Also the North 300 feeC of Lot 3 and North 300 feet of LoL 4, lying <br />Fasterly of Slate 12oad No. 1; all in Blocic 1, l3everly F-Iome Tracts, <br />Division No. 2; ALSO Lol 2, Block 1, Bevcrly Home Tracts, <br />Division No. 2; �XC�PT Che SouCh 275. 62 feet per p1aC recorded in. <br />Volume 10 of Plats, page 25, records of S.nohomish County, Washington. <br />WH�REAS, January S, 1973 tvas fixed as thc date of hearing on said <br />application and proper notice having been given as required by law, and <br />WI-IER�AS, a public hearing was held on said date and �he Board of AdjusC- <br />ment, after reviewing all testimony, made tlic findings that: <br />1. There is no apparent hardship shown Uy lhe applicanC. <br />2. There are no signs in llie immediate arca Cl�at are over the thirty-five <br />(35)foot required heighl. <br />3. The granting of Chis variance will adversely affecC the comprehensive <br />general plan. • <br />4. The imposilion of the 35 foot requirement would nol deny Mr. Pignalaro <br />Che same properCy righCs enjoyed by neighUoring properCies. <br />NOW, TH�RErOR�, Uased on the fm�egoing findings: <br />D� IT ORDLR�D IIY TH� CITY OF �VERI�TT I30ARD Ob' ADJUSTM�NT ChaC <br />said applicalion Ue DrNIED; and <br />13� I'P L'INALI.Y OP.DP�'RP:D thaL a copy ot Chis �vriCten order be Ci•ansmiCl:cd to <br />thc applicanh for ll�eir i.nformation. <br />DAT� OF ACTION; January 8, 1973 <br />. �. _ <br />�=.�9 .�;.'t�-� -- <br />Iteid TI. Shuciccy, Secr�:�•y <br />73oard of AdjustmenC <br />