My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3620 BROADWAY VERIZON 2019-01-11
>
Address Records
>
BROADWAY
>
3620
>
VERIZON
>
3620 BROADWAY VERIZON 2019-01-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 11:15:42 AM
Creation date
12/20/2018 2:31:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BROADWAY
Street Number
3620
Tenant Name
VERIZON
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y f <br /> Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No.983917 <br /> Stadium Flowers Addition March 10,2017 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 4 <br /> Erosion Hazard <br /> The criteria used for determination of the erosion hazard for affected areas include soil type, slope <br /> gradient, vegetation cover, and groundwater conditions. The erosion sensitivity is related to vegetative <br /> cover and the specific surface soil types,which are related to the underlying geologic soil units. The Soil <br /> Survey of the Snohomish County Area, Washington, by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) was <br /> reviewed to determine the erosion hazard of the on-site soils. The surficial soil on site is mapped mainly <br /> as Norma loam, with nearby Alderwood-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes. The erosion hazard <br /> for these materials are listed as slight. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> General <br /> It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the site is compatible with the planned commercial <br /> addition development provided all recommendations provided in this report are incorporated into the <br /> development plans and strictly implemented during construction. <br /> Our explorations indicated that the site is partly underlain by surficial undocumented fill soils with <br /> medium dense or better native glacial soils at shallow depths. The competent native glacial outwash <br /> deposits were encountered at approximately 1.6 to 2.4 feet below the existing ground surface with the <br /> excavation, corresponding to depths of approximately 2.4 to 6.4 feet below the projected surface of the <br /> asphalt or concrete existing throughout the site. We should note that localized areas of deeper unsuitable <br /> soils and/or undocumented fill could be encountered at this site and exposed at the proposed foundation <br /> subgrade elevations depending on final site grading and development plans. These unsuitable soils, if <br /> exist, would likely be associated with previous grading activities and/or the installation of utilities <br /> surrounding the perimeter of the property. <br /> The underlying medium dense or better native soils should provide adequate support for the planned <br /> structure. We recommend that the structure could be designed utilizing conventional spread foundations. <br /> Footings should extend through any undocumented fill, organic soil, or loose materials, and be founded <br /> on the underlying medium dense or better native soils encountered at depth. We provide <br /> recommendations for temporary and permanent cut slopes in the Temporary and Permanent Slopes <br /> section of this report. Weshould be retained to review proposed grading plans prior to construction. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES,INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.