My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4307 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2018-12-26
>
Address Records
>
RIVERFRONT BLVD
>
4307
>
4307 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2018-12-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2018 1:44:49 PM
Creation date
12/26/2018 1:44:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERFRONT BLVD
Street Number
4307
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C 16O 0171 <br /> y- <br /> � ) LOKI, IL <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 096 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-01 Date: 7/12/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> DFR 052 <br /> X4.'s - , "rTSJ:Nx�+.•3+. .'+�`...x-' 'V;�;ua.".s',fifiN', sayer'..', * s a:<.T 'z ,. '4 .'.t -:t::e'2s '"-`r. ;-s ...r .'u.x r :y,. <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Sunny, 70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Arrival/Departure:•1145/1715 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Prepared By: Benjamin Weinberg <br /> Attachments: m Site Plan(s) © Density Test Summary Signature: -� u <br /> ❑ Installation Records 0 Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg, was on-site at the request of Doug Ross with <br /> Polygon to observe earthwork activities. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> GeoDesign noted that BDZ was in the process of setting hubs for the grading of Road B, Road C, DM/"N", and 01W"K". <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had cut the foundations for Lots 147, 154, and 158. <br /> GeoDesign noted that the concrete contractor had formed and placed reinforcing steel for the foundation for Lot 147 and <br /> was in the process of forming the foundation area for Lots 154 and 158. <br /> Lot 147 <br /> GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade for Lot 147 consisted of a brown silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c) <br /> which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe under the full weight of the user. In-place <br /> density tests taken directly outside of the formed foundation area (and which had the same probing resistance as exposed <br /> material within the forms)indicated that fill material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as <br /> determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation is currently suitable <br /> for support of the intended load. <br /> Lot 153 <br /> GeoDesign noted that exposed foundation subgrade for Lot 154 generally consisted of a brown silty SAND (f-m)with gravel <br /> (f-c)which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe under the full weight of the user. <br /> In-place density tests taken under the foundation area indicated that the exposed foundation subgrade had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. It is the opinion of <br /> GeoDesign that the exposed foundation is currently suitable for support of the intended load. <br /> Lot 158 <br /> GeoDesign noted that exposed foundation subgrade for Lot 158 generally consisted of a brown silty SAND (f-m)with gravel <br /> (f-c)which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe under the full weight of the user. <br /> In-place density tests taken under the foundation area indicated that the exposed foundation subgrade had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. It is the opinion of <br /> GeoDesign that the exposed foundation is currently suitable for support of the intended load. <br /> A summary of our observations and the density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Nuclear <br /> Density Gauge Data. <br /> The client and contractor were notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site today. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 210 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900Yr' <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br /> a, � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.