Laserfiche WebLink
G O DESIGNki FIELD REPORT <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 082 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 11/10/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1505-005 <br /> 1111b... MID <br /> . ... <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 50's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1315/1400 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) j Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, EIT <br /> Attachments: m Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: may: <br /> 0 Installation Records 0 Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT:GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lot 229. <br /> SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Now that we have entered the wet season, it is more likely that surficially loose and saturated soil (i.e. mud and <br /> muck)will develop in areas where exposed soil gets wet.We recommend that excavations be graded to drain water <br /> away from the foundation and crawl space areas.We also recommend that excavation of the foundation areas be <br /> sequenced to minimize exposure to wet weather and disturbance from construction activities. If this sequencing is <br /> not feasible,then a thin layer of clean crushed rock can be placed over the exposed soil to protect the exposed <br /> soil during wet weather construction activities. Foundation subgrade evaluations should be scheduled just prior to <br /> construction of concrete forms to avoid the deterioration of the foundation subgrade after our evaluation. Before <br /> footings are poured,we recommend that any mud that has developed in footing areas be scraped off and removed. <br /> We recommend that we be contacted to re-evaluate footing subgrade if significant deterioration has occurred <br /> since our previous visit. <br /> LOT 229: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that the east 1/3 of the foundation subgrade area could be probed 1-3 feet using a 1/2 inch <br /> diameter soil probe and recommended that the loose soil be removed down to firm and unyielding material and replaced <br /> with a clean crushed railroad ballast material. Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had over-excavated the footing areas 1 to <br /> 3.5 feet down to firm and unyielding ground;the width of the over-excavated areas were approximately 4 feet. GeoDesign <br /> noted that the base of the over-excavated areas consisted of gray silty SAND(f-m)with gravel (f-c)which could be probed <br /> less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. The over-excavated areas had partially filled with water from recent <br /> precipitation; DDS was in the process of dewatering the over-excavated areas while we were on-site today. After the water <br /> had been pumped away, GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS that the over-excavated areas were currently suitable for <br /> placement of backfill material. It is our understanding that the contractor intends on backfilling the over-excavated area with <br /> a 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material by the beginning of next week. <br /> The west 2/3rd's of the footing and crawl space area was still covered with approximately 1-2 inches of surficially loose and <br /> saturated material which should be removed prior to placement of concrete. <br /> The client and contractor were notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications Throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not indude supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 /f <br />