Laserfiche WebLink
GE I DE. IGN 4S4)1 FiverfleDn+ FIELD REP ..� <br /> of 2w <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 084 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 11/27/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> v: to , <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 50's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1430/1500 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, EIT <br /> Attachments: <br /> El Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: <br /> 0 Installation Records 0 Other Reviewed By: ,F,.., <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lot 228 &229. <br /> SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Now that we have entered the wet season, it is more likely that surficially loose and saturated soil (i.e. mud and muck)will <br /> develop in areas where exposed soil gets wet. We recommend that excavations be graded to drain water away from the <br /> foundation and crawl space areas. We also recommend that excavation of the foundation areas be sequenced to minimize <br /> exposure to wet weather and disturbance from construction activities. If this sequencing is not feasible, then a thin layer of <br /> clean crushed rock can be placed over the exposed soil to protect the exposed soil during wet weather construction <br /> activities. Foundation subgrade evaluations should be scheduled just prior to construction of concrete forms to avoid the <br /> deterioration of the foundation subgrade after our evaluation. Before footings are poured, we recommend that any mud that <br /> has developed in footing areas be scraped off and removed. We recommend that we be contacted to re-evaluate footing <br /> subgrade if significant deterioration has occurred since our previous visit. <br /> LOT 229: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that the west 2/3rd's of the footing areas were covered in 1-2 inches of surficially loose and <br /> saturated soil which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding soil. Today, GeoDesign observed DDS <br /> remove the loose soil from the abovementioned footing areas using a grade rake. The exposed soil could be probed less <br /> than 1 inch using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that exposed foundation subgrade for Lot 229 is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that any loose and saturated soil that may build up beneath footing areas during <br /> construction activities be removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> Lot 228: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that Lot 228 was covered in surficially loose and saturated soil which we recommended be <br /> removed prior to the placement of concrete. Today, GeoDesign noted that the loose material had been removed from the <br /> footing areas. The exposed soil could be probed less than 2 inches. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that exposed foundation subgrade for Lot 229 is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that any loose and saturated soil that may build up beneath footing areas during <br /> construction activities be removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> The client and contractor were notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site.A summary of our <br /> observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />