My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4510 31ST AVE SE 2018-12-27
>
Address Records
>
31ST AVE SE
>
4510
>
4510 31ST AVE SE 2018-12-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 11:48:40 AM
Creation date
12/27/2018 11:48:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
31ST AVE SE
Street Number
4510
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NIMIDESIGN ! 4 5) D l , ) FIELD RE R- <br /> 1 of 2 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 086 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 1/3/2018 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) _ Weather: Cloudy,40's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0945/1000 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) 1715/1730 <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, EIT <br /> Attachments: ❑ Site Plan(s) ❑✓ Density Test Summary Signature: 07:, <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By:- ailegiay, <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lot 249 &278. <br /> SU 'Y OF OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 249 <br /> • - •sly, GeoDesign noted approximately 2-3 feet of loose and saturated gray-brown silty SAND with gravel along the <br /> south perimeter of the footing area which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding soil and replaced with <br /> structural fill. During our morning visit, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor over-excavated the <br /> south edge of the building area down 2-3 feet to a gray-brown silty SAND with gravel which could be probed less than 1 <br /> inch using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe; the excavation extended approximately 4-5 feet from the outside edge of <br /> proposed footing. GeoDesign notified the client and contractor that the over-excavated was suitable for placement of backfill <br /> material prior to leaving the site. During our evening visit, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor <br /> had backfilled the over-excavated area with a clean 2-inch crushed rock material compacted into a firm and unyielding <br /> mass. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the footing areas observed today for Lot 249 are currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. We recommend that any surficially loose and saturated soil that may build up beneath footing areas be <br /> removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> Lot 278: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted approximately 6 inches of loose and saturated gray silty SAND with gravel along the south <br /> perimeter of the footing area (-15 feet long section)which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding soil <br /> and replaced with structural fill. During our morning visit, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor <br /> over-excavated the area identified down to a gray silty SAND with gravel which could be probed less than 1 inch using a 1/2 <br /> inch diameter soil probe. GeoDesign notified the client and contractor that the over-excavated was suitable for placement of <br /> backfill material prior to leaving the site. During our evening visit, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation <br /> subcontractor had backfilled the over-excavated area with a clean 2-inch crushed rock material compacted into a firm and <br /> unyielding mass. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the footing areas observed today for Lot 278 are currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. We recommend that any surficially loose and saturated soil that may build up beneath footing areas be <br /> removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.