Laserfiche WebLink
Cadman,Inc. August 31,2018 Page 4 <br /> The 4,000-gallon water truck used to supply water to PIT-2 and PIT-3 was refilled two times (approximately <br /> 12,000 gallons) in order to complete the PITs. In PIT-2, 79 stages were analyzed with a repeated head drop of <br /> 0.2 feet(Figure 4).The final stage of the testing period was used to estimate the measured infiltration rate for <br /> PIT-2. This is a conservative analysis method. The field measured infiltration rate at the end of the testing <br /> period was 42.1 inches per hour(in/hr). <br /> In PIT-3, seven stages were analyzed with a repeated head drop of 0.2 feet (Figure 6). The final stage of the <br /> testing period was used to estimate the measured infiltration rate for PIT-3.The field measured infiltration rate <br /> during the final stage of the testing period was 1.10 in/hr. <br /> Recommended Design Infiltration Rates <br /> Measured infiltration rates from the PITs,including PIT-1 which was completed in 2017 and used as the design <br /> infiltration rates for the Hardeson Pond facility, are summarized in Table 1. <br /> TABLE 1. MEASURED AND RECOMMENDED DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE - HARDESON POND <br /> Measured Infiltration Rate Design Infiltration <br /> Location (in/hr) Rate(in/hr) <br /> PIT-1 4.7 1.6 <br /> PIT-2 42.1 14.2 <br /> PIT-3 1.1 0.4 <br /> The design infiltration rate is determined by applying correction factors to the measured infiltration rate. The <br /> correction factors account for uncertainties in site variability and number of tests, testing method, and <br /> long-term reductions in permeability due to plugging from biological activity and accumulation of fines. <br /> Table III-3.3.1 of the 2014 SWMMWW describes the correction factors to be used to estimate design <br /> infiltration rates. <br /> Table III-33.1 Correction Factors to be Used With In-Situ Saturated <br /> Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements to Estimate Design Rates <br /> Issue Partial Correction Factor <br /> Site variability and number of locations tested CFv=0.33 to 1.0 <br /> Test Method <br /> . Large-scale PIT . CFt=0.75 <br /> . Small-scale PIT . =0.50 <br /> . Other small-scale(e.g.Double ring,falling head) . =0.40 <br /> . Grain Size Method . =0.40 <br /> Degree of influent control to prevent siltation and bio-buildup CFm=0.9 <br /> Total Correction Factor,CFT=CFv x CFt x CFm <br /> • CF0 accounts for site variability and number of locations tested. A CF„ of 0.75 was used for consistency <br /> with previous PITs. <br /> • CFt is determined based on the test method.The CFt for small-scale PIT testing is 0.50. <br /> • CFm accounts for the degree of influent control to prevent siltation and bio-buildup and is 0.9. <br /> The total correction factor CFT for the PITs is 0.338. When applied to the measured infiltration rates of 4.7, <br /> 42.1 and 1.1 in/hr,the design infiltration rates for the Hardeson Pond are 1.6, 14.2 and 0.4 in/hr,respectively. <br /> GEOENGINEERS <br /> Foe No.7087-028-02 <br />