My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1110 RAINIER AVE A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNO CO 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
RAINIER AVE
>
1110
>
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNO CO
>
1110 RAINIER AVE A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNO CO 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 10:32:45 AM
Creation date
2/13/2019 9:24:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RAINIER AVE
Street Number
1110
Unit
A
Tenant Name
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNO CO
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />Evcrett Housir,g Authority <br />May 16. 2012 <br />� <br />JN 12080 <br />Page 9 <br />although the manufaclurers of the admixtures should be consulted. Where vapor retarders are <br />used under slabs, iheir edges should overlap by at least 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive <br />tape. The sheeting should extend io the foundalion walls for maximum vapor prolection. If no <br />potential for vapor passage ihrough the slab is desired, a vapor barrier shouid be used. A vapor <br />barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.01 perms when tested in <br />accordance with ASTNt E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this <br />requirement. <br />In the recent past, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommended that a minimum of 4 inches of well-graded <br />compactable granular material, such as a 5l8-inch-minus crushed rock pavement base, be placed <br />over the vapor retarder or barrier for iheir protection, and as a"blotler" to aid in the curing of the <br />concrete slab. Sand v�as not recommended by ACI for this purpose. However, the use of material <br />over the vapor retarder is controversial as noted in current ACI literalure because oF the potential <br />that the protectionlblolter material can become wet belween the time of its placement and the <br />insfallation of Ihe slab. If the material is �vel prior to slab placement, which is always possible in the <br />Puget Sound area, it could cause vapor transmission to occur up through the slab in the future, <br />essentially destroying the purpose of the vapor barrier/retarder. Therefore, If there is a potential <br />that the proiectionlblotter materia! will become wet before the slab is instatied, ACI no�v <br />recommends ihat no protertionlblotter material be used. However, ACI then recommends that, <br />because there is a uutenlial (or siab cure due to the loss of the blotter material, joint spacing in the <br />siab bP re�uced, a low shrinkage c.oncrete mixture be used, and "other measures" (steel <br />reinforcing, etc.) be used. ASTM E-1643-98 "Standard Practice for Installation of Water Vapor <br />Retarders Used in Contact �vith Earth or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs" generaliy agrees with <br />the recent ACI literetu�e. <br />We recommend that the contractor, ihe project materials engineer, and the owner discuss these <br />issues and review recent ACI titerature and ASTIv1 E-1643 for installation guidelines and guidance <br />on the use of the prolectionlblotter material. <br />The Generel, Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walfs, and Drainage Considcrations <br />sections should be •eviewed for additional recommendations related to the conlrol of groundwater <br />and excess water vapor for the anticipated construction. <br />EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES <br />No excavaled slopes are anticipated olher than for utility trenches. Excavation slopes should nol <br />exceed the limits specified in local, state, and nafional governmenl safety regulations. Temporary <br />cuts to a deplh of about 4 feet may be attempted verticaliy in unsaturated soil, if there are no <br />indications of slope instability. However, vertical culs should not be made near property <br />boundaries, or er.isting utilities and siructures. Based upon Washington Administrative Code <br />(WAC) 296, Part N, lhe soil at the subject site would generally be classified as Type B. Therefure, <br />temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height should nol be excavaled at an Inclination steeper <br />than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending conlinuously benveen the top and the bottom of a cut. <br />The above•recommended temporary siope inclination(s) is based on the conditions exposed in our <br />explorations, and on what has been successful al other sites evith similar soil conditions. It is <br />possible that variations in soil and groundwater condilions will require modifications to the <br />;nclination at �vhich temporary slopes can stand. Temporary cuts are those that will remain <br />unsupporied for a relalively short duration to allow for the conslruction of foundalions, retaining <br />walls, or utilities. Temporary cut s!opes should be protected wiih plaslic sheeting during wet <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.