|
Draft 7/27/2018 10
<br /> Figure 4 provides a snapshot of Table 11. The table shows that for the 1995 Proposed
<br /> Action with 33,500 employees,the PM peak hour trips would be 2,700 inbound and
<br /> 9,615 outbound,which added together results in 12,315 total PM peak hour trips.
<br /> Figure 4-DEIS Section 4.2.2 & Table 11
<br /> 4.2.2 Traftlle Volumes
<br /> Trip generation rates are assumed to follow current patterns. Because of the increase in site
<br /> employment,there would be a substantial increase in the trips generated,as shown in Table 11.
<br /> Note that because of a decrease in employment in the year 2000,there could be a slight demease
<br /> in trip generation as compared to 1995.
<br /> Table 11
<br /> 'TRIP GENERATION-PROPOSED ACTION-BOEING PEAS
<br /> ~
<br /> Number of Trips
<br /> Number of (mboundlotttbountl)
<br /> Employm
<br /> AM Ptak PM Peak Daily
<br /> • 1978 EIS 18,550 4,510560 1,490/5,325 36,830
<br /> I989 Peak Pmptoyymem 25,660 6,2351775 2,065/7,365 50,950
<br /> 1995 Proposed Action 33,500 8,150/1,010 2,700/9,615 66.575
<br /> 2000 Proposed Action 32,000 7,780/960 2,57519,185 63,595 •
<br /> Note also that Section 1.4.2 shown in Figure 3 above cites 9,400 current trips which is a
<br /> rounding of the 9,430 calculated for 1989 peak employment from Table 11 (2,065 +
<br /> 7,365=9,430).
<br /> Figure 5 provides a simplification of the key PM peak hour trip numbers with totals
<br /> shown.
<br /> Figure 5-Summary of PM Peak Hour Trips from Existing Environmental Reviews
<br /> PM Peak-Hour Trips(PHT)
<br /> Number of PM PHT PM PHT PM PHT
<br /> Employees Inbound Outbound Total
<br /> 1978 EIS 18,850 1,490 5,325 6,81.5
<br /> 1989 Peak Employment 25,660 2,065 7,365 9,430
<br /> 1995 Proposed Action 33,500 2,700 9,615 12,315
<br /> 2000 Proposed Action 32,000 2,575 9,185 11,760
<br /> Though the 2000 Proposed Action with employment of 32,000 is shown in Table 11, for
<br /> the purpose of analysis 33,500 was used.
<br /> c:\users\campk\documents\opened_from_outlooklattachment c(methodology).doc
<br /> 106
<br />
|