My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4406 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2019-03-14
>
Address Records
>
RIVERFRONT BLVD
>
4406
>
4406 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2019-03-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2019 3:42:55 PM
Creation date
3/14/2019 3:42:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERFRONT BLVD
Street Number
4406
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> S <br /> E.' 1 DESIGNY FIELD REPORT <br /> p <br /> Pro'ect Name:. Everett River Front-Simpson Report:ort: 112 <br /> GeoDesign# Pol •on-127-01 Date: 9/06/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1505-005 <br /> None; DFR 052 Resolved Today <br /> +,i. <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 60's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1530/1715 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) I Prepared 1y Ben Weinberg, ELT. <br /> T. <br /> Q) Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary, ),Signature: i <br /> Attachments: ...... , � .--- -----7----- <br /> h- <br /> IN <br /> Installation Records Li Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg, was on-site at the request of Doug Ross and Eddy <br /> Stevens with Polygon to resolve nonconformance issues along D/W"B"and to observe foundation subgrade for Lots 117 <br /> and 118 <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 117: <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that foundation excavation subcontractor had finished digging the footing and crawl space <br /> area for Lot 117. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a brown-gray silty SAND <br /> (f-m) with gravel (f-c). GeoDesign noted that the exposed perimeter foundation subgrade for northwest, northeast,and <br /> southeast corners of the lot were covered in surficially loose and saturated material that could beprobed up to 6 inches; <br /> probing depths below the surficially loose and saturated material were less than 1 inch under the full weight of the user. For <br /> the remainder of the exposed foundation subgrade, penetration depths encountered were less than 1 inch under the full <br /> weight of the user;in-place density tests taken on the south,east, north, and west sides indicated that the material had <br /> been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade is suitable for support of the intended structure and <br /> recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the foundation prior to the <br /> placement of concrete. A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Nuclear <br /> a- - auge .-ta and Figure 1. <br /> Lot 118: <br /> ••on arrival,GeoDesign noted that foundation excavation subcontractor had finished digging the footing and crawl space <br /> area for Lot 118. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a brown-gray silty SAND <br /> (f-m) with gravel (f-c)which could be penetrated less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe; in-place density <br /> tests taken on the west,south,and east side indicated that the material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its <br /> maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the <br /> foundation,prior to the placement of concrete. A summary of,our observations and density tests taken today can be found <br /> in the attached Nuclear Density Gauge Data and Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services,We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 210 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 �3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.