4412 29TH AVE SE 2019-03-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

z FIELD REPORT E _ V�._ f 1 of Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 118 GeoDesign# Pol on 127-01 Date: 9/21/2016 Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: PW1505-005 Cil' Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) j Weather: Cloudy, 60's ' Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1445/1515 Distribution: ... _..._ Doug Ross(Polygon) I Kirk Keck(City of Everett) —rBen Weinberg, E.I T ' Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared+ By: 0 Site Plan(s) ® Density Test Summary Signature: "'�x�` Attachments: , _ L._... __...._ ._._ ❑ Installation Records 0 Other Reviewed By: le„Z PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg,was on-site at the request of John Feltner with Polygon to observe foundation subgrade for Lots 128 and 127 SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: Lot 128: Previously, GeoDesign had observed approximately 80%of the exposed foundation subgrade on 9/19/2016;today,we observed the remainder of the excavation on on the southwest corner of the foundation/crawl space area. The exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray-brown silty SAND(f-m)with gravel (f-c)that could be penetrated less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe under the full weight of the user. An in-place density test taken on the south half the west side indicated that the exposed foundation subgrade material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade is suitable for support of the intended structure and recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the foundation prior to the placement of concrete. A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Nuclear Density Gauge Data and Figure 1. Lot 127: Today,GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavating the foundation/crawl space area for Lot 127. The exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a gray-brown silty SAND(f-m)with gravel (f-c)which could be penetrated less than 3 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. In-place density tests taken on the north,south,and west sides of the foundation area indicated that the exposed foundation subgrade had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation subgrade observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the foundation prior to the placement of concrete. A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Nuclear Density Gauge Data and Figure 1. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services,We rely an the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative,Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"Section. 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 210 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095