My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4506 29TH AVE SE 2019-03-15
>
Address Records
>
29TH AVE SE
>
4506
>
4506 29TH AVE SE 2019-03-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2019 8:01:45 AM
Creation date
3/15/2019 8:01:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
29TH AVE SE
Street Number
4506
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEO EI( Iz FIELD REPORT <br /> o <br /> ._ . 095 <br /> I <br /> Project Name Everett River FrontReport Simpson ___._.___ ...__.._ _.. ___.._._____....___ . ..- -- ---_-- <br /> i GeoDesign#: 1 POIygon-127-03 Date: 2/19/2018 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> i <br /> L <br /> ��...,. _ ...-, ,..oma.. -� <br /> ii <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 30's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) _ Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1600/1645 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Keck(City of Everett) 0800/0830 <br /> Ben Weinberg, EI <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) ; Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By <br /> • <br /> m Site Plan(s) T <br /> m Density Test Summary ( Signature: >%�----//e--,---= <br /> Attachments: '---- <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: 1 <br /> .r..a a..« .. ........,,�.....a„.w�.. ...tee....« ..v.....�..»-....,. �.........,.. <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lot 203. <br /> SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 205: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 205. The exposed <br /> footing subgrade soil generally consisted of a gray-brown silty AND with gravel that could probed less than 2 inches using <br /> a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the footing subgrade soils was tested using a Troxler <br /> Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated that material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its <br /> maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. GeoDesign noted an approximately 15 feet long area <br /> at the west end of the south perimeter footing which could be probed 6 to 12 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe; we <br /> recommended that the material be removed and replaced with structural fill. GeoDesign observed the removal of material <br /> while on-site down to firm and unyielding soil.The over-excavated area was backfilled with 2-inch clean crushed rock <br /> material compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that exposed foundation subgrade observedtoday is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> foundation areas prior to the placement of concrete. Foundations should not be poured on frozen ground; any soils <br /> loosened from frost-heave should be removed from the base of foundation areas prior to placement of concrete. <br /> Lot 204: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 204. The exposed <br /> footing subgrade soil generally consisted of a gray-brown silty AND with gravel that could probed less than 2 inches using <br /> a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the footing subgrade soils was tested using a Troxler <br /> Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated that material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its <br /> maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that exposed foundation'subgrade observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> foundation areas prior to the placement of concrete. Foundations should not be poured on frozen ground; any soils <br /> loosened from frost-heave should be removed from the base of foundation areas prior to placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of observations and density tests taken can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Nuclear Density Gauge Data. <br /> The contractor was notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site today. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By”section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.