My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-41 2019-03-21
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
3003
>
BLDG 40-41
>
3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-41 2019-03-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2019 9:36:39 AM
Creation date
3/21/2019 9:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
3003
Tenant Name
BLDG 40-41
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drew Martin <br /> From: Kaylene Nelson <kaylene.nelson@hermanson.com> <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:08 AM <br /> To: Drew Martin <br /> Subject: FW: City of Everett Permit Services: 3003 West Casino Road (M1809-013) - Second <br /> Review <br /> Attachments: ISAT Anchor loads for stand.pdf; roof new vs old.pdf; 180611. 40-041 AC.-5 Replacement <br /> - IFC Drawing Submittal 6.11.18 -Weights - REV2.pdf; SEISMIC CERT DS.pdf; 182284- <br /> Rev4 - DS Seismic FS Install Instructions.pdf; SEISMIC FLOORSTAND CALCULATION <br /> DATA.pdf <br /> See below and attached. <br /> Kaylene Nelson I Hermanson Company, LLP I Direct 253-796-5838 I Cell 253-359-7147 <br /> From:Jeff Schuck<jschuck@hermanson.com> <br /> Sent: Monday, February 4,2019 12:45 PM <br /> To: Kaylene Nelson<kaylene.nelson@hermanson.com> <br /> Subject: RE:City of Everett Permit Services: 3003 West Casino Road (M1809-013)-Second Review <br /> The drawings suck to many schedules all over lapping very incomplete causing confusion for all.Attached is the anchor <br /> loads from Vertiv(Liebert) not part of a submittal only have4 this since it came with the stand. The revised drawings and <br /> mark up of drawings for split of roof level 3rd floor. Take a look and let me know if you think this is what he is looking for <br /> I feel like I am-guessing or-he-just will not-match info up. Submittals-give weights as best-as possible-for-existing. <br /> 2.Sheet 3M63R indicates an existing AC-5 weight of 1,150 Ib,while Sheet M523R indicates 2,750 lb. Note that the <br /> former weight is less than the weight for the new unit of 1,450 lb. Please confirm the original weight and the <br /> discrepancy. If the new weight is heavier, additional information substantiating the capacity of the supporting framing <br /> (i.e., per the original comment) shall be provided. <br /> Sheet 3M63R was confused with CU-weight for units being removed should have been 2,750 based on <br /> manufactures unit data <br /> Sheet M523R 2,7501bs based on manufactures data for existing unit <br /> Sheet M523 has new unit weight of 1,470LBS for AC-5 and 590 for CU-1 these weights are per approved <br /> submittal. <br /> 3.The original comment incorrect assumed the new CU-1 is replacing an existing unit. The new unit is actually located <br /> at the Roof per Sheet 3M61,while Sheet 3M61R(referenced in the original comment)shows the Third Floor Plan and <br /> does not include an existing CU=T. The original comment shall be addressed. _ <br /> This is the 3rd level roof the building has a multi-level roof. The as-built drawing set did not include a roof level <br /> at-3r floor: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.