Laserfiche WebLink
,e),61\ <br /> G El i l DE I Nz 4L FIELD REI T_ <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson • Report: 058 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 07/18/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 60-70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1130/1615 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> Attachments: <br /> m Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: 07', <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: RL <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of Brandon/Leroy with <br /> BDZ to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 254 and 253. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 254: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that the east side of Lot 254 required approximately 3.0 feet of over-excavation to expose firm <br /> and unyielding material which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. Today, GeoDesign <br /> noted that BDZ had backfilled the over-excavated area and filled below-plan-grade portions of the west side with a <br /> cement-treated gray-brow silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c)which was previously above its optimum moisture content. <br /> GeoDesign noted that the cement dust was added to stockpiles of material outside the foundation area and thoroughly <br /> mixed using the bucket of an excavator. GeoDesign noted that the material was mixed, placed, and spread in <br /> approximately 6-18 inch loose lifts using a Komatsu PC300 excavator and compacted into a firm and unyielding mass using <br /> a Hamm 3410 smooth-drum vibratory roller. Penetration depths encountered shortly after compaction were less than 2 <br /> inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> the foundation area prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> LOT 253: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that BDZ had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 253 using a <br /> Komatsu PC300 excavator. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray to gray-brown silty <br /> SAND with gravel and concrete/asphalt. Penetration depths encountered across the west side of the lot area were generally <br /> less than 1 inch. GeoDesign noted that that the east 1/4 of the lot area required approximately 3.5 feet of over-excavation to <br /> expose firm and unyielding ground which could be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> GeoDesign notified the contractor that the over-excavated area was suitable for placement of backfill material. GeoDesign <br /> noted that BDZ partially backfilled the over-excavated area with a cement-treated gray-brow silty SAND (f-m)with gravel <br /> (f-c)which was previously above its optimum moisture content. GeoDesign noted that the cement dust was added to <br /> stockpiles of material outside the foundation area and thoroughly mixed using the bucket of an excavator. GeoDesign <br /> noted that the material was mixed, placed, and spread in approximately 18 inch loose lifts using a Komatsu PC300 <br /> excavator and compacted into a firm and unyielding mass using a Hamm 3410 smooth-drum vibratory roller. Penetration <br /> depths encountered shortly after compaction for the first lift was less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not indude supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the`Reviewed RV'section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />