Laserfiche WebLink
this Plan is the effect of the somewhat higher levels of congestion on the choice to use <br /> other modes of travel. This effect is reflected in the forecast travel volumes that were <br /> reviewed in the EIS. For this Plan, congestion will be represented as the percent of local <br /> arterial mileage that exceeds generalized capacity in each of the planning subareas as shown <br /> in Table 5. <br /> Table 3 REVISED <br /> Unmitigated System Congestion <br /> Total Arterial and Freeway Lane Miles that Exceed Generalized Vehicle Capacity <br /> SUB-AREAS/ 2012 Total 2012 Arterl 2012 FreewUnmitigatedUnmitigate0% Unmitgtd <br /> ALTERNATIVES Ln Mileage Ln Mileage Ln Mileage Arterial Freeway Art/Frwy <br /> Preferred Plan in 2012 440 330 110 69 Ln miles 66 Ln miles 21%/60% <br /> Subarea 1 142 106 36 10 Ln miles\'36 Ln miles 9%/100% <br /> Subarea 2 1101 78 32 18 Ln miles 0 Ln miles 23%/0% <br /> Subarea 3 32 20 12 2 Ln miles 0 Ln miles 10%/0% <br /> Subarea 4 50 38 1215 Ln miles 12 Ln miles 30%/100% <br /> Subarea 5 76 58 18 16 Ln miles 18 Ln miles 28%/100% <br /> Subarea 6 30 30 0 8 Ln miles 0 Ln miles 27%/100%, <br /> The existing delay due to capacity "exceedences" and the no-delay condition (relatively <br /> unrestricted movement throughout the existing network at posted speeds within the limits <br /> of optimum signal and lane capacity assumptions) provide a basis for comparison, and the <br /> "generalized maximum daily volumes at capacity" establish a range within which travel <br /> behavior often shifts or changes to adjust to real or perceived delays. <br /> This congestion shown in Table 5 remains on the system after planned improvements are <br /> assumed to be in place. In the case of larger projects, such as regional rapid rail, the <br /> facility will not have been in operation long enough (or will not have become fully <br /> operational) prior to 2012. Any effect it might have on congestion would therefore be seen <br /> in later years. <br /> Objective # 3: Principles, Commitments and Policies <br /> Overall Objective: Establish a standard of performance for the transportation system <br /> that is consistent lith both the short and long-term land use vision of the City and <br /> recognizes the congested conditions that Hill remain after affordable improvements are <br /> put into place. <br /> Planning Principles and Commitments: <br /> (1) Everett accepts the rate of growth in travel demand that is <br /> consistent with a change in its planning decisions to support mixed-use <br /> centers and a more pedestrian/transit oriented community <br /> 191 <br /> T-26 <br />