My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2021-94
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2021-94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2019 11:57:15 AM
Creation date
4/19/2019 11:55:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2021-94
Date
8/3/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EVERETT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> LAND USE ELEMENT <br /> 1.16.5 Develop a fiscal impact model which permit applications in a fair and timely manner. 41111 <br /> analyzes the costs of providing services and The City shall periodically evaluate its permit <br /> the revenues to be realized from proposed processing practices to ensure efficient and <br /> annexations. Such a model should identify the timely processing of permit applications. <br /> impact upon the City, Snohomish County, and <br /> the other providers of public services within V. LAND USE MAP <br /> the annexation area. <br /> A. Map: The Land Use Map of the Land <br /> 1.16.6 Enter into agreements with neigh- Use Element is the official map designating the <br /> boring cities, Snohomish County and other desired land use pattern for the Everett of the <br /> service providers concerning the sharing of the future. The map graphically represents the <br /> costs and revenues associated with providing Land Use Element policies as they are carried <br /> services to all portions of the Everett Planning out in a preferred land use pattern throughout <br /> Area. the Everett Planning Area. For example, <br /> many the goals of the Housing Element or <br /> 1.16.7 Develop public service agreements Economic Development Element will be im- <br /> with service providers concerning the delivery plemented by the type of land use designation <br /> of services to a proposed annexation area given to an area by the Land Use Map. The <br /> before submitting the annexation proposal to goals of the Transportation Element will be <br /> the Boundary Review Board. better achieved when appropriate land use <br /> designations are given to specific areas. The <br /> 1.16.8 Annexation boundaries should be funding of public facilities called for by the <br /> based upon logical service areas, should Capital Facilities Element can be more <br /> attempt to eliminate existing irregular boun- economically realized by proper land use <br /> daries to the extent possible, and should meet designations. The map is only to be used in <br /> the objectives of the Boundary Review Board conjunction with the written policies of the <br /> stated in RCW 36.93.180. comprehensive plan, as the policies indicate <br /> how the community wishes to implement its <br /> 1.17 Property Rights and Permit vision for the city, its goals and objectives for <br /> Processing. The GMA includes goals (#6 and land use and the other related elements of the <br /> #7) related to protection of private property plan. <br /> rights, and the fair and timely processing of <br /> permit applications. The following policies B. Legal Effect: Under the State Growth <br /> are established in accordance with these goals. Management Act, all zoning actions and <br /> development regulations must be consistent <br /> 1.17.1 Private Property Rights . The City, in with the community's adopted comprehensive <br /> applying policies of the Land Use Element, plan. This requirement had never been <br /> shall not take private property for public use specifically stated in the law prior to the <br /> without making just compensation. In apply- passage of the Growth Management Act. This <br /> ing the policies of the Land Use Element, the requirement gives greater legal weight to the <br /> City shall protect the rights of private property map and text of the comprehensive plan. <br /> owners from arbitrary and discriminatory Recent case law in the Washington court <br /> actions. system has become increasingly oriented to the <br /> validity of the comprehensive plan even when <br /> 1.17.2 Processing of Permits The City shall zoning was not consistent. <br /> continue to process land use and building J <br /> LU-58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.