My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4513 31ST AVE SE 2019-04-23
>
Address Records
>
31ST AVE SE
>
4513
>
4513 31ST AVE SE 2019-04-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 1:28:11 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 1:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
31ST AVE SE
Street Number
4513
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEODESIGN S-\ FIELD R <br /> vl� �� � 1 of <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 053 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 06/30/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 60-70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1445/1530 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> Attachments: <br /> m Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: -- <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: RL <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 258, 268, and 269. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 268: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign identified unsuitable fill material for Lot 268 which required removal and replacement with structural <br /> fill. GeoDesign noted that the unsuitable material had been removed down to approximately 6 feet below plan bottom of <br /> footing and replaced with structural fill material compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined <br /> by a Modified Proctor analysis. Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed grading of the foundation and crawl <br /> space for the lot area. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray-brown silty SAND with <br /> gravel which could be probed less than 3 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe and a thin layer of 2-inch clean <br /> crushed railroad ballast in the northeast corner. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and/or saturated material be removed from the base of the <br /> foundation area prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> LOT 269: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign identified unsuitable fill material for Lot 269 which required removal and replacement with structural <br /> fill. GeoDesign noted that the unsuitable material had been removed down to approximately 6 feet below plan bottom of <br /> footing and replaced with structural fill material compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined <br /> by a Modified Proctor analysis. Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed grading of the foundation and crawl <br /> space for the lot area. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray-brown silty SAND with <br /> gravel which could be probed less than 3 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and/or saturated material be removed from the base of the <br /> foundation area prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> LOT 258: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that DDS had excavated the Lot,258 area down to firm and unyielding material which required <br /> over-excavation of approximately 1 foot below plan bottom of footing. Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed <br /> backfilling the lot area with approximately 1.5 feet of 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material compacted compacted <br /> into a firm and unyielding mass. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation observed today is currently <br /> suitable for support of the intended structure. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.