My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3000 ROCKEFELLER AVE AMPITHEATER 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ROCKEFELLER AVE
>
3000
>
AMPITHEATER
>
3000 ROCKEFELLER AVE AMPITHEATER 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2019 7:26:30 AM
Creation date
4/26/2019 7:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ROCKEFELLER AVE
Street Number
3000
Tenant Name
AMPITHEATER
Notes
NEW BUILDING ADMIN EAST
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 12, 2004 <br />Interpretation <br />Proj: Snohomish County Admin. Plaza <br />Location: 3000 Rockefeller Ave. <br />Permit: 60408-002 <br />Code: 2000 International 3uilding Code <br />Subject: Acceptance of alternate design method per Section 104.11 <br />Proposal: The aisle stairs at the prop�sed amphitheater provide landings t�at <br />are approximately 34" deep (rougiily equivalent to residential landings) in- <br />between 13" deep treads. Section 1003.3.3.4 (stairvvay landings) excepts aisle <br />stairs complying with Section 1008. Section 1008 does not specify required <br />depths for landings. <br />If treads were created to be of equal length, they would be approximately 20" <br />deep each: <br />. This could result in an unusual gait for many users ar_customed tc ii" <br />treads. <br />. This would result in a greater trip hazard when iraversing to/from the <br />stairs and stepped platforms. <br />. The resultant 20" landings/steps would provide less room for <br />perpendicular transitions than the 34" landings. <br />. This interpretation is not without prescient and has been employed in <br />various projects around the region. <br />The proposal is therefore acceptable as Section 1008 has no specific <br />requirements for landing depths and the proposed design is accepted as <br />equivalent or superior to the prescriptive re�uirements for safety. <br />Tony R. Lee <br />Plans Examiner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.