Laserfiche WebLink
2. Habitat Management Plan. The director may require that all or a portion of the following be <br /> included in a habitat management plan: <br /> a. A map drawn to scale or survey showing the following information: <br /> i. All lakes, ponds, streams, wetlands and tidal waters on or adjacent to the subject property, <br /> including the name (if named), and ordinary high water mark of each, and the stream or wetland <br /> category consistent with the requirements of this chapter; <br /> ii. The location and description of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area on the subject <br /> property, as well as any potential fish and wildlife habitat conservation area within a distance of <br /> the subject property that may impact an affected species or habitat; and <br /> iii. The location of any observed evidence of use by a species regulated by the provisions of the <br /> fish and wildlife habitat sections of this chapter. <br /> b. An analysis of how the proposed development activities will affect the fish and wildlife habitat <br /> conservation area and any affected species including the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative <br /> effects of the proposed action on the regulated species and its habitat within the project area. <br /> c. Provisions to reduce or eliminate the impacts of the proposed development activities on any fish <br /> and wildlife habitat conservation area and affected species.The HMP should describe components <br /> of the project that may benefit or promote the recovery of listed species and are included as an <br /> integral part of the proposed project.These conservation (or mitigation) measures serve to <br /> minimize or compensate for project effects on the species under review.The following items should <br /> be addressed: <br /> i. Provide specific recommendations, as appropriate, to reduce or eliminate the adverse <br /> effects of the proposed activity. Potential measures include: timing restrictions for all or some of <br /> the activities; clearing limitations; avoidance of specific areas; special construction techniques; <br /> HMP conditions; replanting with native vegetation; potential of habitat enhancement (i.e.,fish <br /> passage barrier removal); best management practices, etc.; <br /> ii. Include a description of proposed monitoring of the species, its habitat, and mitigation <br /> effectiveness. <br /> d. The HMP shall identify the specific habitat objectives the HMP is designed to achieve and <br /> include recommendations regarding all actions taken which are necessary to avoid reducing the <br /> likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term, and/or actions to <br /> maintain or enhance the significant features present. <br /> 19.37.075 Wetlands,streams and lakes - mitigation plans—required content <br /> A. Wetland and buffer impact mitigation plans. <br /> 1. Include a baseline study that quantifies the existing wetland and buffer functions, functions that will <br /> be lost, and the functions after mitigation.This could involve assessing functions using Calculating <br /> Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington:Final Report, <br /> March 2012. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 10-06-011, or as amended; <br /> 2. Specify how functions will be preserved or replaced; <br /> 3. Specify how impacts will be avoided, minimized or compensated for; <br /> 4. Assess the potential changes in wetland hydroperiod from the proposed project and identify how <br /> the project design will mitigate adverse impacts to the wetland hydroperiod; <br /> 5. Describe the future vegetation community types for monitoring years, including dominant <br /> vegetation expected. Plants shall be native species, commercially available or available from local <br /> sources, high in food and cover value for fish and wildlife,and mostly perennial; <br /> Planning Commission Resolution 19-04 Page 23 <br /> Critical Areas March 19, 2019 <br />