Laserfiche WebLink
d. Only one dock shall be permitted for all lots in any short subdivision or subdivision that <br /> occurs after September 1,2000.Such dock shall be shared between all lots in the short <br /> subdivision or subdivision. <br /> e. Covered over-water moorage, either fixed or floating,shall be prohibited. <br /> f. No dock may be located within 15 feet of an interior lot line, unless shared with the owner of <br /> the adjacent lot, in which case no setback is required. <br /> g. No single-family lot shall have more than one dock. <br /> h. No dock shall exceed four feet in width, 25 feet in length or five feet in height above the <br /> ordinary high water mark on the landward side. <br /> 6B. Reasonable Use Exception.This section does not apply to areas within jurisdiction of the <br /> Shoreline Master Program. <br /> a4. Nothing in this chapter is intended to preclude reasonable economic use of property as set <br /> forth in this title. If the requirements of this chapter as applied to a specific lot would deny all <br /> reasonable economic use of the lot, development will be permitted if the applicant <br /> demonstrates all of the following to the satisfaction of the planning director: <br /> ie. There is no other reasonable use or feasible alternative to the proposed development <br /> with less impact on the critical area; and <br /> iib. The proposed development does not pose a threat to the public health, safety and <br /> welfare on or off of the subject lot; and <br /> iiie. Any alterations permitted subject to the requirements of this chapter shall be the <br /> minimum necessary to allow for reasonable use of the property; and <br /> ivd. The inability of the applicant to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not <br /> the result of actions by the applicant in subdividing the property or adjusting a boundary <br /> line,thereby creating the undevelopable condition after the effective date of the <br /> ordinance codified in this chapter; and <br /> ve.The proposal mitigates the impacts on the critical areas and buffers to the maximum <br /> extent possible. <br /> b-a. Reasonable Use Decision Process. Whenever an applicant for a development proposal <br /> submits a reasonable use proposal to the planning director,the submittal shall include the <br /> following information which will be used to evaluate the criteria for reasonable use <br /> exception: <br /> ie. The location, size, and description of the areas of the lot which are either critical areas, <br /> required buffers,or setbacks required by this chapter; <br /> A description of the location and area of the lot which is within setbacks required by <br /> other standards of the zoning code; <br /> iiie. An analysis of the minimum development necessary to achieve "reasonable economic <br /> use" of the lot, including a narrative which includes a factual basis for this determination; <br /> ivd. An analysis of the impact that the development described in subsection B.2.c of this <br /> section would have on the critical areas and buffer functions, including an analysis of <br /> impacts on fish and wildlife resources; <br /> ve.An analysis of whether any other reasonable use with less impact on the critical areas and <br /> buffers is possible.This must also include an analysis of whether there is any practicable <br /> on-site alternative to the proposed development with less impact, including reduction in <br /> density, phasing of project implementation, change in timing of activities, revision of lot <br /> layout, and/or related site planning considerations that would allow a reasonable <br /> economic use with less adverse impacts to the critical areas and buffers.The phasing <br /> analysis shall address whether pre-project mitigation of impacts to buffers is feasible to <br /> EMC Title 19.37 (Critical Areas) Page 9 <br />