My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30
>
Address Records
>
SEAWAY BLVD
>
3301
>
WHOLE SITE
>
3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 8:09:23 AM
Creation date
6/4/2019 9:20:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAWAY BLVD
Street Number
3301
Tenant Name
WHOLE SITE
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Greg Bertch <br />January 18, 2017 <br />Our stability analyses was performed along three critical slope sections delineated as Cross -Sections A -A', B-B', <br />and C-C'. The cross-section locations are shown on Figure 1. Stability analysis along these sections was <br />performed using the computer program Slide 7.0. Our analysis considered both static and the pseudostatic <br />(seismic) conditions. A horizontal acceleration of 0.16g was used in the pseudostatic analysis to simulate slope <br />performance under earthquake loading. This value is based on the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) peak <br />ground acceleration (PGA) adjusted for pseudostatic analysis following procedures outlined in Section 6.2.2 of <br />the FHWA NHI-11-032 Seismic Design — Geotechnical Features Manual. <br />Soil conditions/geologic units modeled in the sections are based on our test pit field explorations, previous <br />explorations completed by others, and geologic reconnaissance of the slope. Test Pit and Test Boring Logs used <br />for the analysis are attached to this letter. Strength parameters assigned to the soils are based on our experience <br />with similar soil types and local standard practice. Values assigned are summarized in the following table: <br />Table 1— Slope Stability Analysis Soil Parameters <br />Soil Type <br />Unit Weight (pcf) <br />Friction Angle (degrees) <br />Cohesion (psi) <br />New structural fill <br />125 <br />34 <br />0 <br />Existing fill <br />120 <br />32 <br />0 <br />Dense to very dense silty SAND <br />with gravel <br />125 <br />36 <br />50 <br />Dense to very dense SAND with <br />varying amounts of silt and gravel <br />125 <br />38 <br />0 <br />Water <br />62.4 <br />0 <br />0 <br />The results of our slope stability analysis, as shown by the lowest safety factors for each cross section, are <br />presented in the following table: <br />Table 2 — Slope Stability Analysis Results <br />Cross Sections Analyzed (Post Construction) <br />Minimum Safety Factors <br />A -A' <br />1.734 <br />Seismic FS =1.214 <br />1.615 <br />B-B' <br />Seismic FS =1.141 <br />C-C' <br />1.580 <br />Seismic FS =1.122 <br />The results of our analysis indicate that the eastern steep slope will be stable post construction and that the pond <br />can be constructed as shown on the drawings without any adverse impacts to the global stability of the slope. <br />Graphical output of the analysis is attached for City of Everett review. <br />Project No. T-7342 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.