Laserfiche WebLink
Jane Zimmerman <br /> From: Dan Balmelli <dbalmelli@barghausen.com> <br /> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:28 PM <br /> To: Paul McKee <br /> Cc: Sabrina Fandler <br /> Subject: RE: Bertch Phone Call <br /> Attachments: Scan0300.pdf; Seaway Center- Response to City of Everett 3rd Party Review <br /> Comments.pdf <br /> Hi Paul and Sabrina, <br /> Attached are copies of the storm pond sections of the King County Storm Manual, DOE Storm Manual and City of Kent <br /> Storm Manual which have been highlighted in green showing the areas relating to pond setbacks. <br /> The storm manuals have slightly different setback requirements but all require a geotech analysis to address open ponds <br /> adjacent to slopes and when requesting a reduced setback. <br /> The proposed storm pond has always been proposed adjacent to the slope as shown on the current plans. During the <br /> preapplication meeting,the city requested that the original proposed wetpond be revised to eliminate the dead <br /> storage/water quality element and provide a mechanical water quality structure to reduce saturation of the slope. <br /> The SEPA and Site Plan review application the project was approved with the buildings,site plan layout and storm <br /> facility located in the location currently shown. <br /> During the Site Work Construction Plan review process,the city requested a specific geotech analysis addressing the <br /> design and location of the storm pond relative to the slopes. It was determined that the city did not have the resources <br /> to review the geotech report so a 3rd party peer review geotechnical engineer was retained by the city to review the <br /> geotech report. <br /> The applicants geotech engineer has addressed the comments and concerns of the citys peer review geotech engineer <br /> with the updated report which I previously forwarded. The mitigation includes installation of a double wall pond liner <br /> with a leak detection device to prevent seepage and saturation along the pond slope. <br /> The applicant would propose the following additional mitigation measures in addition to the mitigation measures <br /> outlined in the geotech response letter(attached) <br /> 1.The applicant would agree to increase the width of the pond berm along the slope from 6 ft to 15 ft to provide. <br /> additional mitigation/safety factor and increase the setback of the pond from the slope. <br /> 2.The applicant would agree to provide the city of Everett with a hold harmless letter relative to any damage, repair or <br /> maintenance required along the slope caused by any failure of of the storm pond. <br /> Please review and let me know if you need any additional information. <br /> Thanks for your assistance. <br /> Dan Balmelli <br /> Executive Vice President <br /> (206) 396-8588 ce1 <br /> 1/3— <br />