My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30
>
Address Records
>
SEAWAY BLVD
>
3301
>
WHOLE SITE
>
3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 8:09:23 AM
Creation date
6/4/2019 9:20:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAWAY BLVD
Street Number
3301
Tenant Name
WHOLE SITE
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jane Zimmerman <br /> From: Dan Balmelli <dbalmelli@barghausen.com> <br /> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:28 PM <br /> To: Paul McKee <br /> Cc: Sabrina Fandler <br /> Subject: RE: Bertch Phone Call <br /> Attachments: Scan0300.pdf; Seaway Center- Response to City of Everett 3rd Party Review <br /> Comments.pdf <br /> Hi Paul and Sabrina, <br /> Attached are copies of the storm pond sections of the King County Storm Manual, DOE Storm Manual and City of Kent <br /> Storm Manual which have been highlighted in green showing the areas relating to pond setbacks. <br /> The storm manuals have slightly different setback requirements but all require a geotech analysis to address open ponds <br /> adjacent to slopes and when requesting a reduced setback. <br /> The proposed storm pond has always been proposed adjacent to the slope as shown on the current plans. During the <br /> preapplication meeting,the city requested that the original proposed wetpond be revised to eliminate the dead <br /> storage/water quality element and provide a mechanical water quality structure to reduce saturation of the slope. <br /> The SEPA and Site Plan review application the project was approved with the buildings,site plan layout and storm <br /> facility located in the location currently shown. <br /> During the Site Work Construction Plan review process,the city requested a specific geotech analysis addressing the <br /> design and location of the storm pond relative to the slopes. It was determined that the city did not have the resources <br /> to review the geotech report so a 3rd party peer review geotechnical engineer was retained by the city to review the <br /> geotech report. <br /> The applicants geotech engineer has addressed the comments and concerns of the citys peer review geotech engineer <br /> with the updated report which I previously forwarded. The mitigation includes installation of a double wall pond liner <br /> with a leak detection device to prevent seepage and saturation along the pond slope. <br /> The applicant would propose the following additional mitigation measures in addition to the mitigation measures <br /> outlined in the geotech response letter(attached) <br /> 1.The applicant would agree to increase the width of the pond berm along the slope from 6 ft to 15 ft to provide. <br /> additional mitigation/safety factor and increase the setback of the pond from the slope. <br /> 2.The applicant would agree to provide the city of Everett with a hold harmless letter relative to any damage, repair or <br /> maintenance required along the slope caused by any failure of of the storm pond. <br /> Please review and let me know if you need any additional information. <br /> Thanks for your assistance. <br /> Dan Balmelli <br /> Executive Vice President <br /> (206) 396-8588 ce1 <br /> 1/3— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.