My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30
>
Address Records
>
SEAWAY BLVD
>
3301
>
WHOLE SITE
>
3301 SEAWAY BLVD WHOLE SITE 2025-10-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 8:09:23 AM
Creation date
6/4/2019 9:20:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAWAY BLVD
Street Number
3301
Tenant Name
WHOLE SITE
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sabrina Fandler - <br />City of Everett Public Works <br />Engineering / Permit Services Division February 15, 2017 <br />The onsite soils are subject to periodic shallow slides/slumps due to weathering of <br />the upper layers, particularly during extensive wet periods. As the pond crest is <br />located along the top of the steep slope is there a potential that shallow slides could <br />undermine the pond embankment? The Lock and Load Wall Detail provided does not <br />show a detail for the South Wall. Will the 5/8-inch minus crushed leveling pad be <br />founded 3 feet below ground surface, as shown for the North Wall detail? Our <br />concern is shallow sliding of the near surface soils undermining the foundation of the <br />wall. <br />Response: Please see the attached geotechnical engineer response letter prepared <br />by Terra Associates, Inc. <br />The pavement sections presented in the original geotechnical report seem thin for the <br />areas where heavy trucks will operate. The sections presented for heavy traffic areas <br />are 3 inches of HMA over 6 inches of CRB or 5 inches of full -depth HMA. Using a <br />structural coefficient of 0.42 for HMA and 0.14 for CRB, results in design AASHTO <br />Structural number of 2.1. Using a subgrade resilient modulus of 10,000 psi, typical <br />AASHTO input parameters, and the ESAL value presented in the report, we calculate <br />a required structural number of 2.51 using the program Darwin by AASHTO. <br />Response: Please see the attached geotechnical engineer response letter prepared <br />by Terra Associates, Inc. <br />We believe that the responses above, together with the enclosed revised plans and documents, address <br />all of the comments in your memorandum dated October 21, 2016. Please review and approve the <br />enclosed documents at your earliest convenience. If you have questions or need additional information, <br />please contact me at this office. Thank you. <br />Respectfully, <br />� � r <br />Costa Philippides, P.E. <br />Project Engineer <br />CP/hd <br />17798c.004.doc <br />enc: As Noted <br />cc: Greg Bertch, Bertch Capital Partners <br />Kathy Craft, Craft Architect <br />Daniel K. Balmelli, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.