Laserfiche WebLink
January 13,2016 <br /> Project No. T-7342 <br /> c. Any area with all three of the following characteristics: <br /> i. Slopes greater than 15 percent. <br /> ii. Hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with a relatively permeable sediment overlying a <br /> relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock. <br /> iii. Springs,groundwater seepage,or saturated soils. <br /> d. Any area which has shown movement during the Holocene epoch(from 10,000 years ago to the <br /> present)or which is underlain or covered by mass wastage debris of that epoch. <br /> e. Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion, or <br /> undercutting by wave action. <br /> f. Areas of historic failures, including areas of unstable, old and recent landslides or landslide debris <br /> within a head scarp, and areas exhibiting geomorphological features indicative of past slope failure, <br /> such as hummocky ground, slumps,earthflows,mudflows,etc. <br /> g. Any area with a slope of 40 percent or steeper and with a vertical relief of 15 or more feet, except <br /> those manmade slopes created under the design and inspection of a geotechnical professional, or <br /> slopes composed of consolidated rock. <br /> h. Areas that are at risk of landslide due to high seismic hazard. <br /> i. Areas that are at risk of landslides or mass movement due to severe erosion hazards.." <br /> The City of Everett Landslide Hazard, Critical Areas Map 2, dated March 2006, shows the eastern site margin is <br /> within or adjacent a medium landslide hazard area. Existing slope gradients throughout the site vary from 7 to <br /> 100 percent. Therefore,the site would be classified as a landslide hazard by the City of Everett. <br /> Section 37.080.C.3 of the EMC allows for development within geologic hazard areas provided the development <br /> will decrease the risk for the hazard. Based on the grading plan provided, it is our opinion that the final <br /> development will reduce the potential for a landslide at this site. Specifically,the grading plan removes the 100 <br /> percent slopes that are located along the southern property boundary and replaces them with retaining walls and <br /> open flat space.The other slopes are re-graded and are generally incorporated into the flat building areas. <br /> The only slope that will remain in its current condition is the south-southeast slope. This slope has a gradient <br /> between 20 and 60 percent. We did not observe indications of deep-seated instability or persistent groundwater <br /> seepage on or below this slope face, and much of the slope supports growth of relatively-straight mature <br /> coniferous trees. The proposed buildings are located outside of the 50-foot buffer that will be required for the <br /> landslide hazard, however, the proposed detention pond is located directly adjacent the steep slope. Based on <br /> review of the proposed plans, the detention pond will primarily be constructed by excavating below current site <br /> grades with some fill placed in the northeast corner where the existing slope has a gradient of approximately 30 <br /> percent. The pond will be lined to prevent stormwater from infiltrating through the soils and onto the slope. <br /> Equilibrium indicates that by removing heavier soil and replacing it with lighter water the overall stability of the <br /> slope will increase. Therefore, it is our opinion that the pond can be constructed as designed without impacting <br /> the steep slope to the east. <br /> Page No. 6 <br />