Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Stark Residence Addition <br /> 1343 Madrona Avenue <br /> Everett, Washington <br /> December 8, 2014 <br /> RN File No. 2902-001A <br /> Page 5 <br /> The sections were analyzed using the Simplified Bishops method of slices. Slide generates <br /> random potential failure surfaces and determines their corresponding factors of safety with <br /> respect to failure. The factor of safety is defined as the ratio of the internal soil strength divided <br /> by the gravity driving forces that cause failure. By generating a large number of random <br /> surfaces, the factor of safety can be obtained as the lowest number calculated. <br /> Proposed conditions were used to calculate static slope stability in Cross-Section A-A'. We <br /> used the water levels observed in the explorations as the water surface in our analysis. The <br /> factor of safety results are shown in Figure 7. Factors of safety against deep-seated failures <br /> under static conditions were above 1.5 for the proposed conditions. <br /> We evaluated the slope stability for seismic conditions by using the peak ground acceleration <br /> (PGAm) of 0.596g obtained from ASCE Standard 7. Table 10.1 of Soil Strength and Slope <br /> Stability by J. Michael Duncan and Stephan G. Wright references published information from <br /> Makdisi and Seed (1978) indicating that an acceleration multiplier of 0.2 is applicable for a <br /> magnitude 8.25 earthquake. The horizontal acceleration of 0.596g(.2) = 0.119g is less than the <br /> common value of 0.15g. Therefore, we used the more conservative 0.15g in our design and <br /> obtained a factor of safety greater than 1.15. The factor of safety results are shown in Figure 8. <br /> Site Preparation and Grading <br /> The first step of site preparation should be to strip the vegetation, topsoil, loose soils and <br /> pavement to expose medium dense or firmer native soils in building areas. The excavated <br /> material should be removed from the site, or stockpiled for later use as landscaping fill. The <br /> resulting subgrade should be compacted to a firm, non-yielding condition. Areas observed to <br /> pump or yield should be repaired prior to placing hard surfaces. <br /> The on-site transitional beds likely to be exposed during construction are considered moisture <br /> sensitive, and the surface will disturb easily when wet. We expect these soils would be <br /> difficult, if not impossible, to compact to structural fill specifications in wet weather. We <br /> recommend that earthwork be conducted during the drier months. Additional expenses of wet <br /> weather or winter construction could include extra excavation and use of imported fill or rock <br /> spalls. During wet weather, alternative site preparation methods may be necessary. These <br /> methods may include utilizing a smooth-bucket trackhoe to complete site stripping and <br /> diverting construction traffic around prepared subgrades. Disturbance to the prepared subgrade <br /> may be minimized by placing a blanket of rock spells or imported sand and gravel in traffic and <br /> roadway areas. Cutoff drains or ditches can also be helpful in reducing grading costs during the <br /> wet season. These methods can be evaluated at the time of construction. <br /> Structural Fill <br /> General: All fill placed beneath the addition or other settlement sensitive features should be <br /> placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed <br /> methods and standards, and is observed by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils <br /> technician. Field observation procedures would include the performance of a representative <br /> • <br /> Robinson Noble, Inc <br />