My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1901 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1901
>
Geotech Report
>
1901 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 11:22:43 AM
Creation date
6/5/2019 8:33:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1901
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scriven Residence Improvements-REVISED NGA File No 974316 <br /> 1901 West Mukilteo Boulevard November 29,2016 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 4 <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> Geology: The geologic units for this area are shown on the Distribution and Description of Geologic <br /> Units, Mukilteo Quadrangle, Washington, by James P. Minard (U.S.G.S., 1982). The site is mapped as <br /> Transitional Beds (Qtb) with Advance Outwash (Qva) mapped nearby. The Qtb is described as thick <br /> beds of clay, silt, and fine sand. The Qva is described as mostly clean,pebbly sand. Our explorations and <br /> the previous exploration performed by others generally encountered loose surficial material underlain by <br /> fine to medium sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel consistent with the description of advance <br /> outwash deposits. <br /> Explorations: We visited the site on October 24, 2016 to explore the subsurface conditions within the <br /> proposed development areas and the steep slopes with hand hole explorations. The approximate locations <br /> of our explorations are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. A geologist from Nelson Geotechnical <br /> Associates, Inc. (NGA) was present during the explorations, examined the soils and geologic conditions <br /> encountered, and maintained logs of the explorations. <br /> The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, <br /> presented in Figure 4. The logs of our explorations are presented as Figures 5 and 6. The following <br /> paragraph contains a brief description of the subsurface conditions encountered in the explorations. For a <br /> detailed description of the subsurface conditions,the hand auger logs should be reviewed. <br /> In all of our hand hole explorations, we encountered approximately 0.1 to 1.0 of surficial grass and <br /> topsoil. Underlying the surficial soils in all of our hand augers,we encountered approximately 2.4 to 5.0 <br /> feet of loose to medium dense, dark brown to brown silty fine to medium sand with gravel, and varying <br /> amounts of organic debris that we interpreted as undocumented fill soils. Below the undocumented fill in <br /> Hand Augers 1 through 5,we encountered medium dense to dense, light brown fine to medium sand with <br /> varying amounts of silt and gravel that we interpreted as native advance outwash soils. Hand Augers 1 <br /> through 5 were terminated within the native advance outwash soils at depths in the range of 5.0 to 8.0 feet <br /> below the existing ground surface, while Hand Auger 6 met refusal in the undocumented fill soils at <br /> approximately 2.5 feet below the existing ground surface. <br /> We also reviewed the previously performed drilled borings by Geotech Consultants, Inc. It appears that <br /> two drilled borings were performed along the top of slope area within the site. In general, these borings <br /> encountered loose to dense, light brown to brown sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel to <br /> approximate depths in the range of 36.5 to 41.5 feet below the existing ground surface. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.