Laserfiche WebLink
This calcuiation exposure level is well below the 100% FCC limit. Actual <br />exposure cunditions are likely to be much less than this worst-case predicted <br />vaiue. <br />FCC CQMPLiANCE <br />The FCC has determined through calculations and technical analys:s that <br />certain wireless facilities are highly unlikely tc cause public RF exposure in <br />excess of �CC guideline limits. In particular, cellular, ESMR and PCS facilities <br />with non-building-mounted antennas greater than 10 meters (about 33 feet) <br />above ground level are considered ;o have such a low �mpact on overall <br />exposur� conditiong that lhey are "categorically excluded" (i.e., exempt) from <br />the requirement for routir�e em�ironmenial assessment regarding RF exposure <br />hazards. <br />Thus according to FCC rules, the proposed Verizon Facility, wilh all antennas <br />well above 33-foot level, is exempt from further r�F safety environmental <br />assessment because it is presumed to be in compliance with the FCC's RF <br />exposure rules. <br />FUTURE GOMPLiANCE <br />If :uh�re changes at the SEAQ-GARFiLED site causes excessive exposure <br />conditions in publicly accessible areas, the FCC would not hold Verizon <br />�esponsible for the excessive exposure conditions as long as the contribution <br />from the Verizon Wireless facility to the RF exposure envir�nment in belcw 5%. <br />RF Facilities that produce less than 5% of the applicable MPE exposure limit at <br />accessible locations are also considered to be exempt from further study. As <br />demonstrated in this report by worst-case exposure caiculations, the proposed <br />Verizon facility will produce far less than 5% of the applicable exposure limit for <br />the public environments. <br />