Laserfiche WebLink
DEl <br /> DIBBLE ENGINEERS INC <br /> February 23,2017 <br /> City of Everett,Washington <br /> Engineering Public Services Department <br /> 3200 Cedar Street <br /> Everett,Washington 98201 <br /> Attention:Mr.James Bronder,PE,Plans Examiner <br /> Re: West Mall Place Apartments Structural Repair <br /> DE1 Project#:15-555 <br /> Plan Check#:B1701-040 through.042 <br /> Dear Mr.Bronder: <br /> Thank you for your comments in coordination of the West Mal Place Apartments Structural Repair project,located at <br /> 9300 West Mall Drive,in Everett Washington. Your comments for clarification are appreciated in aiding the design of <br /> this project We are writing to provide responses to your comments of a structural nature. In the following text,we <br /> will quote each question from your Plan Check letter and provide a response. <br /> 1. On the General Structural Notes,sheet S1.0'Building Code&Reference Standards",the design code used <br /> for this project is the IBC 2015. However,on the permit structural calculations where the wood shear walls <br /> are checked against the design demands(for example, Bldg A 1st Floor Walls),it appears that the IEBC <br /> Section 404:2.1 is used to check for 75%of the IBC 2015 design demands,which is in conflict with the <br /> intent of the using the IBC 2015 full lateral design demands for wood shear walls. Please verify which code <br /> is being followed for the design of the wood shear wall repair and update the drawings and notes as <br /> required for the appropriate building code. <br /> DEl Response:Thank you for your question. We have used the 2015 IBC for the design of this project.Per <br /> Section 101.4.7 of the 2015 IAC "The provisions of the International Existing Building Code shall apply to <br /> matters governing the repairs,alternation, change of occupancy,addition to,and relocation of existing <br /> buildings." <br /> 2. On the permit structural calculations where the wood shear walls are checked against the design demands <br /> (for example, Bldg A 1st Floor Walls),the use of HDU 5 hold down anchorage appears to exceed the <br /> Demand Capacity Ratio(DCR)by nearly a factor of 3.0(10.9 kips/3.8 kips=2.87)even when using 75%of <br /> the lateral forces in the IBC 2015. Please provide an alternate detail and calculations for these HDU5 <br /> holddowns that are exceeding the DCR values of 1.0. <br /> DE1 Response:The design intent of this project is to provide a series of retrofit design and detailing <br /> recommendations that are classified as'Voluntary Seismic Upgrades,"based upon areas that are <br /> accessible during the course of the architectural cladding remodel. Fundamentally these upgrades are not <br /> DIBBLE ENGINEERS INC 1 1029 Market Street, Kirkland WA 98033 1 425.828 4200 1 dibbleengineers.com <br />