1912/02/05 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

904 FEB-51912 RECORD OF CITY COUNCIL r 11 90 c,9,Council met.regular session Penna.5th,1912;were called to order by hie 751 at I 2003 o'clockIP.11. On Roll call all councilmen were present. II . The m.o.of the last regular easel.'were then read by Piss gat Her.,ilead.g Cleric,after • 41 . 11 Ph iell thera being no objections or corrections there.,sue were ordered oar.v.d'V We we., I• Counell Bill 9638 wu then given.reading tuni upon motion of Dux...555222 53 Hiller,con- 2 i It'X'111antwear'Lne7maddeerbyerrOdarls'On71.1'7whalle11 —ad7oart'ameo'1ct is'edtake:1117:1111to Thursday aven.g,Pali. F..1912,at eight o'onock p.ip;mien a public sees1 a.bld 55 5512 for the Purpose of oonsidering Protalits and recommendations effecting Cowell Hill#P9S —Same carried unulmo.19 3 A musage from We Wvor relating to Sumo..1 DO39 W.tren read and accepted ud placed on 0 ; filo. Me message appears as follow: II I To We lough.City Council. 0 Si. • 10 Owflu.1— • We proposed ordinanoe for a regulation Su on each separate delivery of.tohiating 11 0 liquor°.comas before yona twig.for It.Wird reading. I Ups it may pass. It is intend.to mare • 0 We local optiu law effective end to put a ma.on Me iil.d pig so that It au be sew. It is easier 0 . to prove u ille.1 delivery W.an illegal sale. This is a Paulus for t.enforecement of law. 0 • Hoot of t.m.bers of tiliss agninistration were pledge*to law enforcement. There ars objections La.ord.anae eaa some of then.y we well toren. If so,we V should remove them by changing the terms of We ordinance. Three objections have bun raised.mY 0 Itnowledge• First,our prohibition friends obIeot to the revenue feat.altaget.. If it seems wise 0 to tha C.c.We possibility of rave.under the bill ou.removed without affect.g seriously the I force of the ordInance• 1 m„,..tt,..Seoond„,thsoolheotion is raised that under the ord.ance We.n in We I•owert Wo boYe • wed will pay am large a tax.the rich man who orders a barren. r am 0 not at ov.ouro tWt the tax would oo od000 so tags cost to We consumer.any cue aa it Prob.,doe. II not equal the profit which the wholesaler BM dealer used to allon She niddla.n Wo retailed.goods.0 ...ore.ar ww,wiyers wall oarry their purchaaes home Wan their a.persons and.0 Par ao tar • el. under tne oni.ance. However,if Pie CoUncil fears a real injust.e will be done We man who isnot b. , in small quantities,We obJection owl be removed by reducing the tax to a merely noxWal sum u bY 1 eliminating it altogeWer. I tme Wird WIeetion is soot or sno blind pig and hie thuds. I do not believe W haa II any proper cla.upon tWe administration for proteation against uy measure calculated to suppress him,• He is an out—law and so recognised profeesedly by all irreaPeothe of We.°Mi..u.We wiedu of • ;' j .local option polio, 1 . J 1.ix teo...to s.that Until tile peop.of Sverett.PoPulaw voW..6.We Po/ier , I of LW City.Wis matter,Wis Council ono cc."good citiou ODoold...Port...Due Wan. 1 reaaonably calculaWd to SBC1112,U1 toe suppression of tne tulawful.e of.toWcating liquors, 0 • 1 We Wroe of the ord.ance will not materially suffer ir the tax and controller's receipt V W-10 are cut out provided.the specific consigonent bill and the free del..permit are retained. How,if Wis Council reale 143.in genual accord Wth We wrposa or tno oral00000, 't1! but Mir.It shoWd be amended as aDeve...dated or in so.other particular,it would be well to 1 • defer consideration ud poshone action until needed ueodolente can be prepared. I Respectfully Submitted, I _ . . IIIIMIMMMIll