Laserfiche WebLink
.� msem <br /> 58 <br /> • <br /> The Regular Meeting of the kverett City Council was held at <br /> 10:0all AM March 1,1972,Presides, <br /> Ruckerpresiding. p roll call at was found <br /> that <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Minutes of the enacting held February 23,1972 were pp ved <br /> and printed. <br /> councilman Gimoon 1d etht. held February 23,1972 <br /> a motion was made <br /> Attorney prep <br /> e fvirezoning <br /> pro n41st requested erri <br /> been so much discussion at the ngregarding <br /> this rezone as to <br /> Planning Commission had complied with their reo,est for consideringthewolwhether eeblock, <br /> . whether the Planning Staff had brought Nut <br /> it <br /> he difficult to sort out the facts. For this ren t the <br /> prposed rezone.nShockdey of the Planning <br /> propertyDepartment and discussed it with him and also went out <br /> dand talked with Mr.Collins of Guardian Enterprises and as a result had <br /> r <br /> picture entirequestion. For this reason he said a wanted to make <br /> a motion at this time. <br /> MOTION RECONSIDERED Moved by Councilman Gipson,seconded by Councilman <br /> reconsider <br /> the <br /> G n Enterpriseropertyosouth o uncil Meeting regarding <br /> between <br /> rezoning <br /> Rucker and Colby. <br /> Councilymn Dobler asked if this on/4nou1 amendment wouldon e <br /> be made <br /> tht to recon- <br /> e previous <br /> motion. He said,after thinking it over,he really felt that <br /> the 225 feet depth of rezone requestedrect,that most of the other zoning along that area was _ <br /> mately 125 feet. So he really felt that tp iantantra'br resanedr. <br /> t should be of the 125 foot deece. <br /> ere was ruled that this wast a motion to reconsider the <br /> previous mtion -o y <br /> • <br /> On the motion to reconsider <br /> • <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> AYES. Gipson,Aldcreft,flinch,Rucker <br /> NAYS: Langu,Michelson,Dobler <br /> Motion Carried <br /> REZONE Moved by C ea Gipson,seconded <br /> Councilman <br /> authorize Councilman <br /> n rdn <br /> rezoning <br /> the property in on o41st Street a applied for by <br /> Guardian Enterprises. <br /> Councilman Dobler asked <br /> Attorney, <br /> requestcouncil for rezoning <br /> deleting athe ha 5mfootistrip <br /> Mr.Jones said he fe/t the Council could not do this. That <br /> there are the propertyee ways to rezone owner roperty, (1)w (2) n <br /> m petition <br /> the <br /> Council requesting n � <br /> (Sl a motion bY the <br /> • requesting ed. He said <br /> ub heo <br /> Planning Commission it would t thzoning ordinance. <br /> e <br /> rezoning and if the Council should change this after it came from e <br /> p <br />