Laserfiche WebLink
p.-102 <br /> The/Deg-4, Meeting.of theiRverett <br /> f t all 9 presiding. Upon Ro11 ca t was <br /> minutes of th,Meoting held May 31, /972 wore aZnreved id Prini". <br /> 1..l moaslmen were present. <br /> Councidman <br /> irDm Vie qg, hog. 5 P-U had,b <br /> the <k,Fire and now City 2a/1. <br /> do.I96 Hearing was held on the proposed rezone:roe R-S,Single <br /> Family Density Suburban-Residential <br /> Zone,for Mrs.Penni'MaV Kuntz of <br /> i 1420 nu r eo Boulevard. <br /> Reid _ request would <br /> pent,the lot sioe to be reduced from 12,590 square feet to <br /> 7,900 square feet per lot. This would allow Mrs.three lots on the remaining portion of the parcel Kuntz <br /> the <br /> R-1 Single Pamily Low Dendity ReSidence Zone. He Said at <br /> the regular meeting held in April,and Planning Commission <br /> had tabled action on this request aAnstoncted <br /> to investigate specific problems and ndternative the <br /> Staff <br /> regarding Darlington-hane. There was confusion over where <br /> the existing road was located in relation to the right-of-way <br /> and discussion as to what City policy should be with <br />, ,the widening of the street from its existing 10 feet. <br /> regard <br /> h <br /> The Staff met and af ter discussion with Mrs.hunts,who a <br /> the <br />! . misalignment of,tale vightief-way a,.read...ours oolY betWeeO <br /> Dull and Mukilteo Boulevard. The Staff telt that n <br /> r b <br /> le <br /> solution to the overall width problem was to vacate l <br /> portion remaindertoa <br /> ed s part of <br /> the read,the fo/lowing alternatives wore le. <br /> (1 Widen southern <br /> boundary <br /> right-of- <br /> way <br /> 90 feet by 224 feet. Tbe former parcel would be 15,960 of 70 feet by 228 feet and would give Mrs.Kunto a parcel ofsquare <br /> et1 one lot. Under <br /> Rl,two lots would be permitted. <br /> 0)I <br /> extended <br /> situationfrom 10 to 20 feet. In this u <br /> the of the lot would contain square feet. The net <br /> result <br /> asof this would be the same therly portion <br /> in alternative 10.since lot <br /> would be allowed�tl u - lots <br /> however,there could <br /> f <br /> a transitional effect between the R properties to the west <br /> and 1 properties to the east. <br /> (3)Vacate 154 feet of Darlington such <br /> boundary widen[ - o 3nef existing <br /> . This <br /> garage, <br /> and a total lot <br /> area of 20,7,0 square the sarse as Alternativeaet.:1 and Again,.the net result be <br /> fq (a) Identical to feet.instead of 30 would <br /> 3,b a,rign <br /> provide a total of 23,760 square <br /> feet on the remaining portion of the parcel. Again,one lot <br /> would be allowed under R-s,but three lots would be permitted <br />