Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> 4 <br /> April 3,1974 I� <br /> Thk gular meeting of theCity-Councilaw d to order at <br /> 8:30a April 3 974 in'the-Conference of Ev City Hall with !!� <br /> all n attendance Councilman Acker who was excused. <br /> OEAIHAGE PROBLEMS <br /> Eethe Engineering Department presented some problems d,Yy; <br /> . <br /> rnv gdrainagete the Council. said he pruld n my e speaking <br /> about <br /> artioolar problems such as Laurel Drive but a he called, <br /> the big picture sed question to the Councilas what <br /> y <br /> municipal=eponsvtheita for Solving these <br /> pro- <br /> blems. Ifttheirr answer a yes, y should be prepared endem y I."I; <br /> if the.answer was no,was <br /> should be prepared form y emergencies 1 <br /> and citizen complaints. • <br /> He said drainage problems fit into two categories, • <br /> I'; <br /> 1. The long range problem that require a master plan <br /> 2. a problem a dng that could b witF r latavely <br /> emaell expenditure Logethextwith a distinct p cyechange.e <br /> master plan or long range planning is deslgnedto p problems i <br /> thfuure. He Said if present development trends c without con- <br /> - <br /> sideration to storm drainage,they were certain a and flooding <br /> would occur. The question was haw to alter asit possibly <br /> 'involve a grass roote solution of retention basis where large <br /> storms <br /> be and bled off c a big p the entire e <br /> saidtn 'this,gets in o policy decisionsnrelated to landeuae and <br /> an <br /> control overldevelopers. <br /> • <br /> He said there were about B immediate problems that approximately <br /> $50,000 could take <br /> rf but of c ethe City went into this, <br /> thwould flooded many requests for this t fhelp. So rare <br /> all of theproblems that have been approved,there has been a state- <br /> thet <br /> made that this was not a general policy,but the main thing was for • <br /> City to stay consr <br /> • <br /> He briefly reviewed the problems of Laurel Drive,Shore <br /> Avenue,Keene and <br /> Graham. said the Laurel Drive problem w obeo theagenda <br />• t the Regular s and be felt t Engineering Department needed <br /> do en m <br /> Avenue n before g back t Council. <br /> theBe Graham problem on t <br /> Lowell Road,the a Highway <br /> e quite anxious to takecareof this andt <br /> had stated they <br /> would go fifty-fifty with the City in resolving the problem inasmucb as <br /> the drainage tdoes come from City aas state Highway property. <br /> Al Hendricks,City Attorney,felt there two questions to solved. ' <br /> endr Spend <br /> ere were t be re <br /> First,can vtheat City erty or-uSec on this drainage problem which might <br /> involve property o and must we spend funds to defend the <br /> City against a dxainge problem suit. <br /> Councilman Minch asked if t to budget money for these <br /> types of expenditures an the Mayowran rede <br /> that t would have <br /> to come out £General Fund and naturally this would take money from <br /> other kinds of General Punservices. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> D <br />