Laserfiche WebLink
77 <br /> n e,19]] 171 <br /> Stine <br /> regularThe <br /> vng o£the Everett City Council w calleto order <br /> wi h 6.19]]in the Conference Rom o EverettCity Hall <br /> C 1 dcroftpwhoewas excusedand. <br /> COUNCIL <br /> unevlmanavveante once except <br /> ]]5-152 N AL,AL ELECTRICCODE <br /> amielJohnston,Building Official,reported they had m union with the u <br /> tedand theelectrical k regarding some of the problems in the adopting the national electrical code and had c <br /> o posed <br /> of the minds on the majority of these questions. <br /> He staff <br /> Gae of eed these questions raised be them was i section 19 a the <br /> they had deleted he wordswas no 2eason locat£or d n fiot reazonegNo this o <br /> vhg instead"except for residential occupancy.. 1"and wereinsert- 'r( <br /> e request, {! <br /> Cin ompton Winlpe^rD oft apartment t hoose own obje"electrical <br /> ted L the wording <br /> et ion 9E but requesteddeleting <br /> words <br /> els trical contract I <br /> in considerablediscussionthe were left <br /> h said i <br /> aswords ns t 18 i the third o£paragraph they were <br /> He sand againthis"notover <br /> in agreement tithe en the with <br /> se <br /> and union peopleg ementvnan edcacueewne with thencontractore •I� <br /> duringetheEflnalsreadingaofethe9ora60010 be made at the r CURar RAE <br /> COUNCIL BILL 776-181 PROPOSED TRAFFIC 0RONANCEs <br /> Hugh Warren of the <br /> Engineering Department briefly reviewed the <br /> e ice <br /> !j <br /> ; <br /> areas <br /> Iadpingthe MTO The nT0 Implementing Ordinance w dRthe <br /> Ever- <br /> ett Traffic and llits amendments v favor the MoelTraf Traffic 66660dd that there a fewmajorbetween the <br /> reaexceptaueeeverettuh Traffic Code addresses aped 1�iha unique Esuch thedesignation of the n>ny £`MibraCED Street Designations. era +id, PVopafiCaapTeeeaeheghkhs 1vnOaysfov ''}uho 1 between the Legislative a Administrative branches of govern- <br /> ' <br /> asldifferentlyightly thanthe existing Traffic Ts Sect <br /> io <br /> nQdnanae provides f h deletion the i authority scooniateinf in p h initiating Ordinance substitutes from he iC e TransportationAdvisory <br /> Committee h action as to retain quo which TAC 1 recommended that thCity retain k g restric- <br /> tions <br /> the <br /> _aloyed <br /> n the Fire Code <br /> oe is <br /> in <br /> s a fire This provision e_ 1and 1lrapriveektssCode b kl the The <br /> initiating provides fortent of h y 1 <br /> 1 <br /> Traffic <br /> were <br /> the 1esaid also they <br /> going littledetailin defining the of the traffice ones the <br /> yo the city council as recommendedbythe o' nT affiAdvsoryCo Committee. <br /> y�. <br /> thority <br /> !al=e reviewed someof the other sections which were r leh `r <br /> He such 1 <br /> ldetems aYpraphicalerrata,streetbeing more ,,,,fdexplaced,etc. said with this traffic code,thearter- <br /> ialordinance, <br /> fdi ce one <br /> a rhehr permit fkECht up to there would be less problems and proper for enforcement o£theseregulations. <br /> ' <br /> The meeting then recessed to the Council Chambers <br /> C: 4 <br />