My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977/09/07 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1977/09/07 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:36:57 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 8:58:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
9/7/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
271 <br /> September 0,19]] <br /> regular meeting o 1' called <br /> der at <br /> 8h3 th hambe h ithrPresident Ii <br /> Ebert presiding n arrived at 11. attendanced all councilmen in Councilman a <br /> SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT REQUEST <br /> J. {Rehki o 6ereviewed the consultanttheir regarding <br /> complete comprehensive v upey a udyvalyxingp preliminary system expansion meet <br /> we supply for the Seattle 11 they had <br /> arrived he final eight alternativeso h1 contemplatedtaking <br /> 50 million gallons per firm <br /> i vo PP f 1 <br /> askng the <br /> icCity o 1"L f N Ll ldi p i ableeavaavouldeaiA <br /> e willing to supply 0 firmby 2000 for city o 3 <br /> Seattle. h a p which included "' � <br /> he Tolt River,the mig9 the CedarRv R f 9f I <br /> considered,be even asking ththe study was asthat timeEiErthe wouldett nela <br /> co I' <br /> consider allowing them to use this an alternative. <br /> Sim Dow on <br /> Gay&Osborne hen reviewed the waterneeds <br /> for the city o <br /> Everett h proposed filtration plant. The filtration study <br /> s £ east north f Arlington,to d scountyline. idi y 2 <br /> ea Marysville and Arlington should <br /> excluded year 00 <br /> . <br /> tnN' <br /> but at that e probably h h <br /> andincluded into L d 2 h ha f system , <br /> ' <br /> umb k Dam is completed, h 2 labl <br /> the q <br /> year is estimated that there would he 200 MGD needed. <br /> Seattlen 1 <br /> additionalan 5 illi y filtrationbe <br /> other hand if the Seattle water is f the same quality as the city of <br /> Everett then the cityhad a catastrophe <br /> needed n amount <br /> of water available to the f the Seattle alternative we accepted. IF <br /> {�tI1 <br /> Sack Speerof the PUD reported REEL <br /> Mn:::!was the building of the dam 141�. <br /> and h 1 n.three II 1 he I <br /> building h and t pcee a the license { <br /> Phase <br /> I waS b economically feasible i PP ra begin wn 1 foundPUD h <br /> al re- <br /> it would not ollow through as the license ,a <br /> states. Thnue e PUO k d d lox hem <br /> t <br /> their1879:and he back with a different p He said <br /> main purpose i into raising thepower rur <br /> eeea seyr supply. awehad <br /> been <br /> nedfopower 1 o£ a � d <br /> nabavailable f .�". <br /> Moved by Councilman k des b i {� <br /> indicates 1 p avail- <br /> able <br /> l <br /> ablenfrom£themSul 000 to furnish Seattle 1 <br /> 0 million gallons a day and the 1 f Everett has no objeotions to �I a <br /> he 1 1 1 I L 1 lobtaining w e $ <br /> Water Everett)as a vi 1 1 1 5 troYolrtan fl <br /> by p hclusion of Alternative Everettty of tle is in no <br /> study. a bound <br /> Rollwas td withall Councilmen voting Y t Councilman Lenges <br /> who voted no a.Councilman Aldcrofwho as absent. ld)llBr. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> )ll.p <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.