Laserfiche WebLink
regular • <br /> 474 <br /> November 15,1978 <br /> meeting <br /> of the <br /> 8:30 am r1Everett, <br /> 5,19 8 ihf thecalled County Courthouse - <br /> with p side�ntt G n presiding and cow in attendance <br /> Councilman Aldcro t. <br /> PLAT OF FIR-EVER IC117810-405) <br /> Dennis Gregoire of the napproval of Planning Department d thetC dthe last tquestioned <br /> nditr • <br /> gardino,i4,s Planning Commission. Re said this had been • <br /> clarified and it read as follows: • <br /> • <br /> eck Road between <br /> aimprovements the west <br /> of theg labworked the developer da hEngdge <br /> Department , <br /> to certainly <br /> oplec cad,but acme pro should be made <br /> for a walkway."." <br /> At that meeting a resident o Road had requested <br /> tthat the sidewalk be placed on thens south side he felt <br /> it <br /> whetherowned,byusomebodylelse <br /> they could ask a developertoimprove prop y <br /> remindedHe also the council the other question they had talked about was <br /> requiring fee of a developer far recreational purpo <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked about the 12.condition regarding a power of <br /> attorny in connection <br /> City Engineer,s this could be required of the developer <br /> rf the council decided to do so. <br /> Verle Long, e dei taking• <br /> unless all engineer <br /> tAe,p developer, <br /> red <br />• that unless established,the majority approved the L t probablywouldnot even e <br /> they w - walkway <br /> on them dt$100tper ml the <br /> purposesrathere,$300 a e appropriate,especially <br /> if the money was spent for a parkacrosstown. <br /> Brad Cattle,City <br /> Attorney,said by law a yr park purposes <br /> ceived from this developer w used in <br /> i enough <br /> benefitto <br /> plat It could not be put into a park across <br /> town asthe developer suggested. <br /> Councilman Baker asked when icy regarding afee for , lot would <br /> e <br /> established and the answer was possibly y he first partof January. •b <br /> • <br /> resident i the developer should <br /> Robeck e plat defin tely,a street. Me asked again <br /> :Rene residents a impacted <br /> be <br /> sewer. He said t first to henothey twere told that <br /> they weren't sure whether would bel possible. <br />• <br /> replied N he developer was g and in r <br /> deepr <br /> line,e6 other people could hook up to it. xt would depend on how <br /> the sewer was,etc. <br /> Ron Borue,a resident felt t children <br /> standing on Ith on <br /> f would <br /> this plat were allowed. <br /> Re suggested routing bus down Rnbeck Road. <br />