My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981/06/11 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1981/06/11 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:28:28 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:29:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/11/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
266 <br /> dune 11,1981 <br /> CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING-SHADOW RUN-ICD 815-231) <br /> Presdde the proponents <br /> s would a n.. .first <br /> nput.e <br /> nvng after whichtime the hearing would be openedp f ?, <br /> d <br /> wouldsted time for rebuttal and PresIdent Baker state. time <br /> By event there Is insufficlent time for. for rebuttal after the catizens had spoken. In <br /> e workshop scheduled thi could <br /> bepurr.... d there <br /> would be no deco made tonyght. <br /> Tam Alllewnoerfera, e vag the o witame <br /> Our h <br /> • signatures ofcitizensoresented pposing dowwith a pRun development. <br />;' " He said there were a number of issues in s proposalb t thehmain <br /> one was of density. He felt the Comprehensave Plan criteria s <br /> 1' uan advisory <br /> be capac1ty. The Cdty has an outdated zoning code <br /> and also a thexapi study <br /> used b <br /> tly thedeveloper <br /> mpu aesly <br /> A <br /> purely <br /> i <br /> have edfrtentire 7crp <br /> Pa should looked n regards the <br /> The <br /> opponents pl <br /> that the ch a be o <br /> My pl n says v should be <br /> cons 1 <br /> lendoerfer said the C-2 zondng has been deemed <br /> riate,,Y <br /> i " • it to Bruce Jones,Assastant Cdty Attorney,who exp1„,X'5, He referred to the cost of the sewer interceptor d adned op , <br /> had It was still In <br /> on commercial <br /> �`y h` oensIty,nn n ng laid 1 Therefore,they id determinedges and that caracItY had been his should be <br /> sue at all. <br /> ”a considered an <br /> recommendation et <br /> lyl}� alv 1lendoeru fthe <br /> e referredfer 1prin y kind i this <br /> aand <br /> f 1 e sa the <br /> ' arterialthat• wthN voiced port voi d a concern a of encroachingupon <br /> single family eigMarhoods,He <br /> d i' Southwesta <br /> .infilling.access, ni and fnot rtaadv in crly affect existing <br /> iterda is met,such <br /> a rt a correct:o ng,a a <br /> neighboghborhaods <br /> • Allendcerfer asked that consideration be given the cumulative <br /> impact this and .he reasons g en the denial <br /> of Woodridge old <br /> also apply to Shadow <br /> (jThe feel t base a should <br /> set for Sector A <br /> entire p tas there Is ties a mch dtmrasi g make <br /> Mf d <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.