My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
909 SE EVERETT MALL WAY IIZUNA CIDER 2019-09-05
>
Address Records
>
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
>
909
>
IIZUNA CIDER
>
909 SE EVERETT MALL WAY IIZUNA CIDER 2019-09-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2019 9:12:48 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 9:12:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
Street Number
909
Tenant Name
IIZUNA CIDER
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
civil&structural <br /> riengineering&planning <br /> 1 1 2019 <br /> CITY OFFlariSgTi619 <br /> Permit Services <br /> Drew Martin, PE,SE <br /> City of Everett <br /> 3200 Cedar St <br /> Everett,WA 98201 <br /> RE: Permit Number: B1901-015, First Building Review <br /> Project Name: lizuna Cider <br /> Project Address:909 SE Everett Mall Way <br /> Dear Mr. Martin, <br /> Itemized below is our response to the review comments dated (02/11/2019)for the above referenced <br /> project. Our response appears in bold. <br /> Structural: <br /> Sheet S2.2 <br /> 1. Structural calculation pages 4 and 7 through 9 provide an analysis of the existing 27"glulam beam. <br /> Page 4 states that the additional weight of the new mechanical unit will not increase the negative <br /> bending moment,which is not correct. In addition,the calculations appear to indicate that the <br /> actual size of the beam is not known,including calculations for both a 5 1/8"and 6 3/4"section; <br /> page 7 indicates the former is overstressed. See IBC Sections 1604.1 and 1604.4. The analysis shall <br /> be revised considering the following criteria: <br /> a. The analysis shall consider the actual size of the beam. <br /> The actual beam size was field verified to be a 6-3/4"X 27"GLB.Refer to the clouded <br /> beam callout on S2.2 and the supplemental calculations dated 02/25/19 for the beam <br /> analysis considering a 6-3/4"X 27"GLB. <br /> b. The analysis shall consider the actual span of the beams north of the 27"glulam beam. The <br /> span dimension shall be specified in the calculations. <br /> A Unit Key Plan was included on page 1 of the supplemental calculations dated 02/25/19. <br /> The Unit Key Plan specifies the span of the beams north of the 6-3/4"X 27"GLB of interest <br /> to be 29'-6". <br /> 250 4th Avenue South,Suite 200 <br /> Edmonds,WA 98020 <br /> ph.425.778.8500 I f.425.778.5536 <br /> www.cgengineering.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.