909 SE EVERETT MALL WAY IIZUNA CIDER 2019-09-05

T 1 , i iiia 1 It 1 March 11, 2011� EC.;-‘1T-- LVE Drew Martin MAR 1 1 2019 RE: lizuna Cider City of Everett B1901-015 —909 SE Everett Mall Way 3200 Cedar Street'Ty OF VERETT Everett WA 982 Permit Services Drew, I have gone through your response letter regarding the above referenced project dated February 11, 2019. Note that a vestibule was added to the plans. This vestibule has been added to accommodate modifications related to the power supplied to the space as well as other suites within the building. Basically, the room will provide access for the power company when necessary without providing access to the entire space. We have also added a cooler box to the production area as shown. The following responses below address your concerns and will hopefully allow you to issue a building permit. 1. A statement has been added to drawing Al to reflect this comment. 2. Note that the occupancy was incorrectly called out on my drawings. This is an F-2 occupancy since the beverages being produced will be less than 16% alcohol (cider). There are no large quantities of hazardous materials associated with an operation of this nature. The only materials used would be sanitizers that are utilized in all facilities of this nature and are not stored in quantities greater than allowed by code. 3. The occupancy has been revised as noted above. I do not feel that the addition of fire sprinklers is required due to this adjustment. My thoughts are as follows: • IBC section 903 does not have specific requirements related to the F-2 occupancy. No sprinklers would be required by this chapter. • This use is a low hazard occupancy per EMC 16.76.060. Based on the chart in 16.76.060 this is the lowest hazard occupancy. • This project is a Level 2 Alteration per the IEBC. In reviewing of Section 804 of the IEBC this leads me to believe that the addition of fire sprinklers is not required. This is based on the fact that there are no shared exits and the total occupant load of the space is less than 30 per 804.2.2 and 804.2.4. (recalculated occupant load is 27). 4. The occupant load for the space has been recalculated and comes out to 27 people. a. No seats are fixed (not even the bench). We have adjusted the seating layout slightly based on real dimensions (the prior plan was showing tables and chairs that were not the proper size and spacing). We are figuring the occupancy for this space based on 15 SF/person. Occupant load for the space is 14 based on this calculation. b. See revised plan. c. This room layout was slightly revised. We have adjusted the layout and area calculations. We are now showing an occupant load of 12 for this space. d. Total Occupant load is 27 as noted above. 5. The restroom was shown in the initial submittal as being modified to address ADA requirements. This should be adequate to provide for accessibility upgrades as noted. //2 2812 Colby Avenue Everett WA 98201 P (425)252-2153 www.2812architecture.com