My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rodarte Construction Inc Everett Station Parking Expansion
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Rodarte Construction Inc Everett Station Parking Expansion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2019 3:08:45 PM
Creation date
10/18/2019 2:55:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Rodarte Construction Inc
Approval Date
10/4/2019
Council Approval Date
9/18/2019
Department
Transportation Services
Department Project Manager
Vince Bruscas
Subject / Project Title
Everett Station Parking Expansion
Public Works WO Number
1807-018
Total Compensation
$1,026,969.00
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
525
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I 1 • For a compaction lot in progress with a compaction CPF less than 0.75 usingan LSL = <br /> p p 9 p <br /> 2 91.5, a new compaction lot will begin at the Contractor's request after the Engineer is <br /> I <br /> 3 satisfied that material conforming to the Specifications can be produced. See also <br /> 4 Section 5-04.3(11)F. <br /> 5 <br /> I 6 5-04.3(10)C2 HMA Compaction Statistical Evaluation — Acceptance Testing <br /> 7 In the table, "WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T 355" is revised to read "FOP for AASHTO T 355". <br /> 8 <br /> I 9 5-04.3(10)C3 HMA Statistical Compaction — Price Adjustments <br /> 10 In the first paragraph, "WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T 355" is revised to read "FOP for AASHTO T <br /> 11 355". <br /> 12 <br /> I13 The first sentence in the second paragraph is revised to read: <br /> 14 <br /> 15 For each HMA compaction lot (that is accepted by Statistical Evaluation) which does not <br /> I <br /> 16 <br /> 17 meet the criteria in the preceding paragraph, the compaction lot shall be evaluated in <br /> accordance with Section 1-06.2(2)D5 to determine the appropriate Composite Pay Factor <br /> 18 (CPF). <br /> I 19 <br /> 20 The last two paragraphs are revised to read: <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Determine the Compaction Price Adjustment (CPA) from the table below, selecting the <br /> 23 equation for CPA that corresponds to the value of CPF determined above. <br /> 24 <br /> Calculating HMA Compaction Price Adjustment (CPA) <br /> I Value of CPF Equation for Calculating CPA <br /> When CPF > 1.00 CPA= [1.00 x (CPF— 1.00)] x Q x <br /> UP <br /> I When CPF = 1.00 CPA= $0 <br /> When CPF < 1.0 CPA= [0.60x (CPF— 1.00)] xQx <br /> UP <br /> I <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Where <br /> 27 CPA= Compaction Price Adjustment for the compaction lot ($) <br /> 28 CPF = Composite Pay Factor for the compaction lot (maximum is 1.05) <br /> I <br /> 29 Q = Quantity in the compaction lot (tons) <br /> 30 UP = Unit price of the HMA in the compaction lot ($/ton) <br /> 31 <br /> I 32 5-04.3(10)C4 HMA Statistical Compaction — Requests for Retesting <br /> 33 The first sentence is revised to read: <br /> 34 <br /> I 35 For a compaction sublot that has been tested with a nuclear density gauge that did not <br /> 36 meet the minimum of 91.5 percent of the theoretical maximum density in a compaction lot <br /> 37 with a CPF below 1.00 and thus subject to a price reduction or rejection, the Contractor <br /> 38 may request that a core, taken at the same location as the nuclear density test, be used for <br /> 1 39 determination of the relative density of the compaction sublot. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 5-04.3(13) Surface Smoothness <br /> I 42 The second to last paragraph is revised to read: <br /> 43 <br /> I City of EverettPage AM-23 Amendments <br /> Everett Station 80 Stall Parking Expansion June 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.