My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6920 SEAWAY BLVD Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SEAWAY BLVD
>
6920
>
Geotech Report
>
6920 SEAWAY BLVD Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 11:53:07 AM
Creation date
11/4/2019 1:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAWAY BLVD
Street Number
6920
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> � Table I <br /> Recommended Compaction Cri[eria for S[ruc[ural Fill <br /> IProject .area *Minimum Percent Compaction <br /> Beneath Fuotings aitd Slabs 95 <br /> IRoadway and Parking �reas <br /> Within 2 feet of subgrade surface 95 <br /> I Lower portions oE [ill 92 <br /> Earth Dikes 92 <br /> I Behind Below-Grade I;alls **90 <br /> *Percent of r�aximum dry density determined in accordance with AS'CM D-I557. <br /> I **Limit cumpaction to between 90 and 92 percen[. <br /> Fill pl�ced in landscape and waste-fill areas need only be compacted to the <br /> Idegree required E�r traf[icability oP cons[ruction equipment. <br /> All s[ruc[ural fill aaterial should be Eree of debris, organic contami- <br /> I nants and cock fragments larger than 6 inches. Particle sizes larger than 3 <br /> inches should be excluded Erom [he top foot of fill. The suitabLli[y o[ <br /> I matec:al for use as s[ruc[ural fill will depend on the gradatton and muisturc <br /> con[ent of [he soil. As Che amoun[ uf fines (ma[erial passing \o. 200 sieve) <br /> increases, soil becumes increasingly more sensi[ive [o small changes in mois- , <br /> Iture content and adequate conpaction becumes more difficult to achieve. We � � <br /> recommend [hat s[ruc[ural fill contain no more than about S percent fines for '� � , . <br /> Iplacemen[ in wet weather. Yl�e percent fines could be higher for placement in � <br /> dry weather, providing that the fil.l ma[erial is mois[ure-conditioned as <br /> � necessary Eor proper compaction. .�, <br /> The on-site soils cunsis[ primarily of sil[y sand (glacial till) depoaits <br /> with some clean outwash sand and gravel deposits along the drainage to the � <br /> ! west. In our opinion, the clean uutwash sand and gravel deposits can be used <br /> as structural fill in mose weather condiCions. The [ill deposits contain a <br /> � substantial a�auunt of Eines and should be used as structural [ill only during <br /> dry weather c:hen [heir moisture content can more easily be wn[iolled <br /> IPeat and Eine-grained si1 [ deposLts are present in some local bog areas <br /> across the si[e. The peat snd sitt are no[ suitable for use as structural <br /> � fill. [Je recommend that these soils be placed in fills requiring lit[le or <br /> no compac[ion, such as lardscane areas, or be wa�ted off-siCe. All exis[ing <br /> vaste fill. on [he s�.te sh�uld be handled in a similar manner. <br /> I �� <br /> - 7 - �'7@OEI191n@@fS � <br /> IIncorporoted � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.