My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
125 SW EVERETT MALL WAY GERBER COLLISION AND GLASS 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SW EVERETT MALL WAY
>
125
>
GERBER COLLISION AND GLASS
>
125 SW EVERETT MALL WAY GERBER COLLISION AND GLASS 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2019 1:18:22 PM
Creation date
11/18/2019 1:08:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SW EVERETT MALL WAY
Street Number
125
Tenant Name
GERBER COLLISION AND GLASS
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Theresa Greene [mailto:te architect(rucomcazt.netj � � <br />Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 3:32 PM <br />To: Niels Tygesen <br />Subject: RE: Gerber Collision & Glass 125 SW Everett Mall Way <br />Thanks Niels - some good news to pass along... <br />A few questions before we head into the weekend: <br />I. The 10'-0" LS on the east property line - is that to be <br />measured from the (e) sidewalk (City ROW)? Is there a min. that nceds <br />to be in our property? 5' maximum could be placed in ROW, the remaining <br />5' would be required to be on the property. Along 1 st,the property line <br />in rclation to the sidewalk Fluctuates, so in the northem portion you <br />could measure from the sidewalk, but heading south you'll need to <br />tnaintain at least 5' within thc properties boundaries. <br />2. Is my detail 5, sheet A 1.2 satisfactory considering this? I <br />need a little clarification on this question -1'm not sure how the cast <br />in place concrete wrb detail applies to the first question. <br />3. Can we reduce the size of tlie (e) planter island on tha[ side? <br />It would still be larger than the I O'-0" but could be designed better <br />for circulation. 1'm presuming your referting to the area by the <br />north-east comer of the building? See aerial below. 1 think iPs a <br />reasonable request to rcduce the landscape width there for vehicular <br />circulation given the prosimiry of the northern curb cut to the <br />building. 1'll work with thc City's Traflic Engineer to detertnine <br />appropriate distances. <br />4. There's a wall of (e) arborvitaes and pretty trees / <br />Iandscaping along the west property line (sharing that island), with a <br />steep grade on our portion and a fence (see attached). Any additional <br />thaughts on this? The trees and shrubs are on the neighboring property <br />and cannot count towards die subject property's landscaping. Intcrior <br />lot lines are required to be 5' wide for each property to effectivcly <br />create a total I O' wide landscape strip. <br />Thanks, <br />Theresa Greene, Architect, PLLC <br />16198 SE 48th Drive <br />Bellevue, WA 98006 <br />Cell: (425) 830-3245 <br />tg.architec��n comcasLnet qnailro:te.architectnn comcast.neV <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.