1304 80TH ST SW EVERETT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2018-01-02 MF Import

• Pagc 2 of 4 they can only effectively operate 70 and that is the variable we used. If we change the original trip generation study variable to spaces the change would result in no change to the new trips projected. PS you can forward this to Michael Brick if you wish. From: Camie Anderson [mallto:canderson@shockeybrent.com] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:25 AM To: Edward Koltonowski Subject: FW: Everett School District Transportation Facility Edward, The string of e-mails below started with Hal calling me regarding the traffic mitigation fees that he received from the City of Everett for their Transportation Facilely that we worked on. It appears that the numbers in your report and our SEPA checklist were different than the ones put in the City's SEPA determination,and yet a new number from Mike Brick below. Please read and give me a call and let me know your thoughts and if you think we can fight this. Thanks! Camie From: Kirk Brooks [mailto:KBrooks@cl.everett.wa,us] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:26 PM To: Camie Anderson Cc: Michael Brick Subject: RE: Everett School District Transportation Facility Camie, Below is the long version of the story that Mike Brick, from our traffic department, sent me. I am passing it along for your review and you can call Mike(425.257-7790)about it if you would like. His new reflections on the mitigation amount Is only slightly lower than his original calculations.As far as I know, the$41,560 was the mitigation amount stated in the SEPA.The SEPA would likely have to be revised (if it could be at this date). I am fairly sure that the appeal period would have been over already.Please give me a call at 425-257.8815. Kirk The traffic mitigation fee was based on the Gibson Traffic Report trip generation analysis, but the City look Issue with some specific calculations in their report. Following is a summary of the calculations completed to develop the traffic mitigation fee, with differences from Gibson's calculations noted in bold. The Gibson traffic report developed a PM Peak Hour bus trip generation rate of 0.5 buses for each bus parking stall based on a count of the existing facility This seems reasonable and appropriate, but the Gibson trip generation for the new site was conducted for a total of 100 bus parking spaces, not the 112 described in the project proposal and shown on the plan. Because the City's traffic mitigation is based on the greatest possible trip generation from the site, it is appropriate to assume that the new facility will be completely filled for purposed of established the traffic mitigation fee. As such, the trip generation rate of 0.5 PM Peak Hour trips per bus parking stall was applied to the total bus parking count and the City calculated a total of 56 PM Peak Hour bus trips, rather than the 50 trips the Gibson report predicted. Applying the trip generation methodology outlined in the Gibson report, this would also result In 56 PM Peak Hour vehicle trips as bus drivers travel to and from the site In their personal vehicles, rather than the 50 trips Gibson's report predicted. With the 11 PM Peak Hour maintenance and office staff trips predicted by Gibson, the City's trip generation would result In a total of 123 PM Peak Hour trips from the new bus facility, rather than the 111 trips predicted in the 2/15/2007