Laserfiche WebLink
. i <br /> . ; � <br /> � � <br /> � <br /> I 2. That such variance is neceesary for the preservation and en�oyment of a <br /> subetantial property right ot the appellant possessed by the ownera ofI <br /> i other properties in the same vicinity or zone. � <br /> I FindlnB: The owner oP the sub�ect propecty has indicated that other <br /> commercial uses in the vicinity exr_eed their parking aupply during peakl <br /> periods and that the on-street parking spaces are then utilized. I <br /> II <br /> I Conclu�ion: The uae of on-street parking spaces for the sub�eet 'i <br /> � property during peak periods is a privilege en�oyed by other busineesesl <br /> in the vicinity and the approval of the request of the applicant does <br /> I not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with thel <br /> limitationa on other properties in the viclnity. <br /> 3. That the authori ution of such variance will not be, materially <br /> ! oetrimental to the publie Welfare or in,7urioua to property in thel <br /> Ivicinity or zone in xhich the property is located. <br /> i <br /> i Finding: The sub�ect propery is attractively landscaped andl o <br /> maintained. The expansion of the retail sales area is not anticipated <br /> �, to change the amount of time which the parking lot is fully utilized m <br /> i' because of the seasonal nature of peak periods of businesa. <br /> .. ., <br /> Conclusion: The expansion of the retail sales floor space is deai�ed � � <br /> � to nake the preeent operation of tha retail/warehouse faeility more � �+ m <br /> afficient. The reaultant parking lot usage increase will not exceed � c o <br /> 1� the capacity of the existing parking lot during the ma�ority of the m o <br /> �, year. Periods r+hen capacity will be exceeded xill be during seasonal ; 0 3 <br /> j sales periods in which the preeent volume of buaineas exceeds the � Z <br /> 'I parking supply� an�f customers use ad�acent on-street parking areas m � <br /> � which provide an additional eleven parking spaces. The periode of � _ <br /> Ibusineas during �+hich the sub�ect property is more dependent upon � _ <br /> I on-street parking does not generally conflict aith surrounding uaea andl ,� , <br /> their parking need�. I � �' <br /> � <br /> O A <br /> 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affecr the "n 3 <br /> � Comprehene�ive Ceneral Plan, i = m <br /> I m.-� <br /> N <br /> � Finding: The Cc�aprehensive Plan desi�ates the subSect property for � <br /> 0 <br /> or <br /> co�ercial use. �' �' <br /> il m N <br /> Conelusion: The varianee requested does not conflict with the policiesj � � <br /> of the comprehensive plan. � ' a <br /> � <br /> z <br /> i i <br /> �I AECOhR�NDA'fION: APPAOVE i <br /> � � <br /> I APPROVE the variance as requested by applicant with the following conditions. ; �' <br /> i z <br /> , o <br /> I� 1. All necessary building permits shall be obtained. � <br /> c� <br /> lii m <br /> i _ i <br /> Prepared by � <br /> RevieWed by � <br /> � <br /> 2444F ' <br /> � �i <br /> II <br /> � <br /> I <br /> I <br /> � <br /> I <br />