Laserfiche WebLink
Naranjo JN 15186 <br /> May 18,2015 Page 3 <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> GENERAL <br /> THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A <br /> GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE <br /> CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD <br /> READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT <br /> The test pits conducted for this study encountered native medium-dense sand at depths of 3 to 6 <br /> feet. Conventional footing foundations that bear on this competent material will provide adequate <br /> support to the residence. In our opinion the basement retaining wall at the east side of the <br /> residence will stabilize the uncontrolled fill to the east. <br /> The steep slope off-site to the north has a potential to experience shallow slope failures, as does <br /> any steep slope in the Puget Sound region. The proposed 30-foot building setback from the base <br /> of that slope should provide an adequate buffer from such shallow failures, <br /> Excavations more than 4 feet in height should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (H:V). <br /> Where excavations cannot be contained within the property and where permission from adjacent <br /> property owners to extend excavations into those properties cannot be obtained, excavation <br /> shoring would be required. We anticipate that shoring may be necessary for the northeast corner <br /> of the residence basement. Stacked concrete ecology blocks may be an appropriate shoring <br /> system. We are available to provide additional shoring recommendations after project plans have <br /> been more completely developed. <br /> In our opinion infiltration of stormwater into the sand that underlies the site is feasible. We can <br /> provide additional recommendations for infiltration once a preliminary infiltration design has been <br /> completed. <br /> The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the <br /> weather conditions that are encountered. We anticipate that a silt fence will be needed around the <br /> downslope sides of any cleared areas. Existing pavements, ground cover, and landscaping should <br /> be left in place wherever possible to minimize the amount of exposed soil. Rocked staging areas <br /> and construction access roads should be provided to reduce the amount of soil or mud carried off <br /> the property by trucks and equipment. Wherever possible, the access roads should follow the <br /> alignment of planned pavements. Trucks should not be allowed to drive off of the rock-covered <br /> areas. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during wet weather. Following <br /> clearing or rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or hydroseed bare areas that will not be <br /> immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. On most construction projects, it <br /> is necessary to periodically maintain or modify temporary erosion control measures to address <br /> specific site and weather conditions. <br /> The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to <br /> prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active <br /> seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors from <br /> the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the <br /> concrete curing process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and <br /> bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />