Laserfiche WebLink
Naranjo Al 15186 <br /> May 18,2015 Page 4 <br /> conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist <br /> air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may <br /> be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential <br /> vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or <br /> mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. <br /> Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the <br /> recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan <br /> review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include <br /> revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical <br /> constraints that become more evident during the review process. <br /> We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report <br /> should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and <br /> recommendations. <br /> SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS <br /> In accordance with the International Building Code (IBC), the site class within 100 feet of the <br /> ground surface is best represented by Site Class Type D (Stiff Site Class). As noted in the USGS <br /> website, the mapped spectral acceleration value for a 0.2 second (Ss) and 1.0 second period (Si) <br /> equals 1.42g and 0.54g, respectively <br /> The IBC states that a site-specific seismic study need not be performed provided that the peak <br /> ground acceleration be equal to SDs/2.5, where SDs is determined in ASCE 7. It is noted that SDs is <br /> equal to 2/3Sp s. SMs equals Fa times Ss,where Fa is determined in Table 11.4-1. For our site, Fa = <br /> 1.0. The calculated peak ground acceleration that we utilized for the seismic-related parameters <br /> (earth pressures and seismic surcharges) of this report equals 0.38g. <br /> The site soils are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction because of their medium-dense nature and <br /> the absence of near-surface groundwater. <br /> CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS <br /> The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing <br /> on undisturbed, medium-dense, native soil or on structural fill placed above this competent native <br /> soil. See the section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for recommendations <br /> regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Adequate <br /> compaction of structural fill should be verified with frequent density testing during fill placement. <br /> Prior to placing structural fill beneath foundations, the excavation should be observed by the <br /> geotechnical engineer to document that adequate bearing soils have been exposed. <br /> We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16, <br /> respectively. Exterior footings should also be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest <br /> adjacent finish ground surface for protection against frost and erosion. The local building codes <br /> should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. <br /> Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending <br /> upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />