My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4518 SEAHURST AVE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
SEAHURST AVE
>
4518
>
Geotech Report
>
4518 SEAHURST AVE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:08:34 PM
Creation date
1/14/2020 7:19:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAHURST AVE
Street Number
4518
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Naranjo Al 15186 <br /> May 18,2015 Page 4 <br /> conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist <br /> air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may <br /> be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential <br /> vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or <br /> mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. <br /> Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the <br /> recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan <br /> review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include <br /> revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical <br /> constraints that become more evident during the review process. <br /> We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report <br /> should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and <br /> recommendations. <br /> SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS <br /> In accordance with the International Building Code (IBC), the site class within 100 feet of the <br /> ground surface is best represented by Site Class Type D (Stiff Site Class). As noted in the USGS <br /> website, the mapped spectral acceleration value for a 0.2 second (Ss) and 1.0 second period (Si) <br /> equals 1.42g and 0.54g, respectively <br /> The IBC states that a site-specific seismic study need not be performed provided that the peak <br /> ground acceleration be equal to SDs/2.5, where SDs is determined in ASCE 7. It is noted that SDs is <br /> equal to 2/3Sp s. SMs equals Fa times Ss,where Fa is determined in Table 11.4-1. For our site, Fa = <br /> 1.0. The calculated peak ground acceleration that we utilized for the seismic-related parameters <br /> (earth pressures and seismic surcharges) of this report equals 0.38g. <br /> The site soils are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction because of their medium-dense nature and <br /> the absence of near-surface groundwater. <br /> CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS <br /> The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing <br /> on undisturbed, medium-dense, native soil or on structural fill placed above this competent native <br /> soil. See the section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for recommendations <br /> regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Adequate <br /> compaction of structural fill should be verified with frequent density testing during fill placement. <br /> Prior to placing structural fill beneath foundations, the excavation should be observed by the <br /> geotechnical engineer to document that adequate bearing soils have been exposed. <br /> We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16, <br /> respectively. Exterior footings should also be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest <br /> adjacent finish ground surface for protection against frost and erosion. The local building codes <br /> should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. <br /> Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending <br /> upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.