My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4518 SEAHURST AVE 2020-01-14
>
Address Records
>
SEAHURST AVE
>
4518
>
4518 SEAHURST AVE 2020-01-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 8:16:03 AM
Creation date
1/14/2020 8:13:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAHURST AVE
Street Number
4518
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Paul McKee <br /> From: James Johnson <johnson1952@comcast.net> <br /> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 2:25 PM <br /> To: Paul McKee <br /> Cc: Susan <br /> Subject: FW:Automatic reply:4518 Seahurst Ave <br /> Attachments: Geotech tree removal concerns.pdf;trees to be coppiced.pdf;site plan revised.pdf <br /> Paul McKee <br /> Permit Services Manager <br /> Public Works <br /> City of Everett <br /> Mr. McKee <br /> Re:SFR 4518 Seahurst Ave <br /> I wanted to follow up on our phone conversation regarding the SFR project at 4518 Seahurst Ave. <br /> I have read the Geotech Consultants report that you referenced regarding tree removal concerns on the property. <br /> You had told me that their report paved the way for the removal of trees on the property. <br /> Their opinion regarding the removal of trees contained conditions and recommendations that may not have been <br /> followed. <br /> I am attaching a copy of that report so that you can verify that this is the document you were referring to. <br /> I have also attached a copy of the revised site plan. <br /> Geotech Consultants recommended that certain trees were to be "coppiced" and that their stump and roots systems <br /> were to be left in place. <br /> The trees in question were not coppiced.They were removed, roots and all. <br /> They also state in their report that their concern is lessened because of ecology block retaining walls that were proposed <br /> for the site. <br /> Those retaining walls are shown on the attached site plan but I can see no evidence of them in the pictures I sent you. <br /> The public works permit that is included with the site plan attachment also indicates in item 6 of the permit conditions <br /> that erosion control measures were to be installed. <br /> When we spoke on the phone,you said that you were now simply recommending to the contractor that he have <br /> materials onsite to provide erosion control when the weather turned wet again. <br /> Can you please address these items ofcontinued concern? <br /> Please reply to both myself and Ms.Abolafya. <br /> I have copied her on this email. <br /> Thank you <br /> Jim Johnson <br /> 206-714-3571 <br /> From:James Johnson [mailto:iohnson1952@comcast.net] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 3:30 PM <br /> To: 'Paul McKee'<PMckee@everettwa.gov> <br /> Subject: RE:Automatic reply:4518 Seahurst Ave <br /> Paul <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.