2802 HOYT AVE EVERETT ELKS 2018-01-02 MF Import

4. The type I hood has been reduced io one hood instead of two. The enclosure has also been revised to a shaft wall type enclosure similar to the elevator shaft. See revised detail 17 on drawing A2.10 and floor plan drawings for the wall type revision. 5. Although not required by code, we typically extend the shaft above the roof level in order to maintain a continuous construction type from the bottom of the shaft to the top. This comment is duly noted and may be utilized in the field if necessary. 6. 'file required clearance from the duct to the shaft is 3" if the enclosure is constructed with non-combustible framing. In this case we are using a metal framed shaft wall which is non combustible. This dimension has been added to detail 17 on drawing A2.10. 7. The construction of the shaft has been revised to provide a shaft installation that does not require finishing on the interior side. See revised deta�l 17 on drawing A2.10. Resilient channels were added to the interior side of the shaft to meet the required sound rating of STC 50. This can be verified by GA File No. W P 7056 which is attached for your reference. 8. The fire sprinkler system will be accessed from a fire line located in Hoyt Avenue. The double detector c;-.ck valve will be located in a vault in the sidewalk on the east side of the building. This revised location is shown on the revised site plan included with this resubmittal. 9. The future sky bridge will be dealt with as a deferred submittal. This is noted on the drawings where the sky bridge is called out. 10. With the floor assemblies as detailed the majority if flooring products will meet the required IIC classification. At this time it is not known what all of the flooring products will be. Note # 16 has been added to the finish schedule so that this can be addressed when the specific flooring products arc chosen. 11. All guardrails are called out on the various sections at the stairs. All guardrails are intended to be constructed with either detail 3 or 5 on drawing A 5.5 with the exception of the center guardrail at the upper floors. The upper floor stair guardrail is intended to be a mesh panel wall with supports as shown in section 1 on drawing A4.1. 12. A letter from Gary Parkinson Architects relating to RCW 64.55 is attached. 12.1. A revised letter from Fatah I3oualamallah is attached. 12.2. Revised drawings from Fatah 13oualantallah are included in the revised drawings included with this resubmittal. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to give me a call. Since' i ;A am 13. Clark Architect OYV