Laserfiche WebLink
_ __ . <br /> Criterion No. 2: <br /> That the variance will not be materially detrimental to ttie property in ihe <br /> area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. <br /> a, Findincts:. The propasal is to install a new 7.5' x 9.5' pote <br /> sign, which will be 23 feet in height. The sign wiil serve to <br /> identify the building as well as products sold on site. The <br /> applicant has stated that since lhere is a large unimproved <br /> right of way in front of tlie subject site, the sign will sit back a <br /> minimum of 20 feet from Evergreen N/ay. <br /> The City provided written notice to s�ll property owners within <br /> 300 feet of the subject property; at itie time the staff report <br /> was completed, no comments had been received. <br /> The City of Everett Public Worl<s and Buiiding Departments <br /> had the opportunity to review the pr000sal. The followi�g <br /> comments were provided: A building aennit is required. An <br /> electrir,al permit is required if the sign is to be lighted. Also, <br /> Public Works has state�i that since a 30"weter main is in the <br /> viciniry of the pole sign the e^plicant shall provide a minimum <br /> 10-foot separation from lhe F�Ie to the main for maintenance <br /> purposes. <br /> b. Conclusions: Since the sign ���ill be located farther off of ihe <br /> Evergreen Way frontage lhan a majority of signs in the area, <br /> the sign shouid have minimal irnpact Qn neiyhboring <br /> properties. The proposed variance shoufd not be materially <br /> detrimental to the neighborhood area or the City as a whole. <br /> Criterion No. 3: <br /> That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general <br /> rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject <br /> properry. <br /> a, Findin s: In 1969 the City of Everett issued a building permit <br /> for the placement of a pole sign on the subject site. Howeve,r <br /> the sign was IikQly located in City right-of-way and has <br /> subsequently been removed. There are several <br /> noncor.forming sicns immediately adjacerit to the site. These <br /> include signs whic;h are over height, exceed sign area, ar fail <br /> to meet required setbacks. By allowing the new sign to be <br /> erected on site the applicant is enjoyir� the same rights of <br /> neighboring properties �nd businesses, by allowing <br /> themselves som� form of public advertising. <br /> Evergreen Way is host to aumerous businesses that have <br /> freestanding signs. Many of these signs do not meet the <br /> current zoning setback requirements. <br /> 3 <br />